DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch
@ 2024-12-25  7:53 Dengdui Huang
  2024-12-25 21:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
  2025-01-08 13:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dengdui Huang @ 2024-12-25  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: wathsala.vithanage, stephen, liuyonglong, fengchengwen, haijie1,
	lihuisong

The prefetch window depending on the hardware platform. The current prefetch
policy may not be applicable to all platforms. In most cases, the number of
packets received by Rx burst is small (64 is used in most performance reports).
In L3fwd, the maximum value cannot exceed 512. Therefore, prefetching all
packets before processing can achieve better performance.

Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
---
 examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h | 42 ++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
index 3c1f827424..0b51782b8c 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
@@ -91,53 +91,21 @@ l3fwd_lpm_process_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
 	const int32_t k = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(nb_rx, FWDSTEP);
 	const int32_t m = nb_rx % FWDSTEP;
 
-	if (k) {
-		for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
-			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i],
-							void *));
-		}
-		for (j = 0; j != k - FWDSTEP; j += FWDSTEP) {
-			for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
-				rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(
-						pkts_burst[j + i + FWDSTEP],
-						void *));
-			}
+	/* The number of packets is small. Prefetch all packets. */
+	for (i = 0; i < nb_rx; i++)
+		rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i], void *));
 
+	if (k) {
+		for (j = 0; j != k; j += FWDSTEP) {
 			processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
 			processx4_step2(qconf, dip, ipv4_flag, portid,
 					&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
 			if (do_step3)
 				processx4_step3(&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
 		}
-
-		processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
-		processx4_step2(qconf, dip, ipv4_flag, portid, &pkts_burst[j],
-				&dst_port[j]);
-		if (do_step3)
-			processx4_step3(&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
-
-		j += FWDSTEP;
 	}
 
 	if (m) {
-		/* Prefetch last up to 3 packets one by one */
-		switch (m) {
-		case 3:
-			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
-							void *));
-			j++;
-			/* fallthrough */
-		case 2:
-			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
-							void *));
-			j++;
-			/* fallthrough */
-		case 1:
-			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
-							void *));
-			j++;
-		}
-		j -= m;
 		/* Classify last up to 3 packets one by one */
 		switch (m) {
 		case 3:
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch
  2024-12-25  7:53 [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch Dengdui Huang
@ 2024-12-25 21:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
  2025-01-08 13:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2024-12-25 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dengdui Huang
  Cc: dev, wathsala.vithanage, liuyonglong, fengchengwen, haijie1, lihuisong

On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 15:53:02 +0800
Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> To: <dev@dpdk.org>
> CC: <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>, <stephen@networkplumber.org>,  <liuyonglong@huawei.com>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>, <haijie1@huawei.com>,  <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch
> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 15:53:02 +0800
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0
> 
> The prefetch window depending on the hardware platform. The current prefetch
> policy may not be applicable to all platforms. In most cases, the number of
> packets received by Rx burst is small (64 is used in most performance reports).
> In L3fwd, the maximum value cannot exceed 512. Therefore, prefetching all
> packets before processing can achieve better performance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> ---

I think Vpp had a good description of how to unroll and deal with prefetch.

With larger burst sizes you don't want to prefetch the whole burst.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch
  2024-12-25  7:53 [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch Dengdui Huang
  2024-12-25 21:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2025-01-08 13:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
  2025-01-09 11:31   ` huangdengdui
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2025-01-08 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: huangdengdui, dev
  Cc: wathsala.vithanage, stephen, liuyonglong, Fengchengwen, haijie,
	lihuisong (C)



> 
> The prefetch window depending on the hardware platform. The current prefetch
> policy may not be applicable to all platforms. In most cases, the number of
> packets received by Rx burst is small (64 is used in most performance reports).
> In L3fwd, the maximum value cannot exceed 512. Therefore, prefetching all
> packets before processing can achieve better performance.

As you mentioned 'prefetch' behavior differs a lot from one HW platform to another.
So it could easily be that changes you suggesting will cause performance
boost on one platform and degradation on another.
In fact, right now l3fwd 'prefetch' usage is a bit of mess:
- l3fwd_lpm_neon.h uses  FWDSTEP as a prefetch window.
- l3fwd_fib.c uses FIB_PREFETCH_OFFSET for that purpose
- rest of the code uses either PREFETCH_OFFSET or doesn't use 'prefetch' at all
 
Probably what we need here is some unified approach:
configurable at run-time prefetch_window_size that all code-paths will obey. 

> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> ---
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h | 42 ++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
> index 3c1f827424..0b51782b8c 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
> @@ -91,53 +91,21 @@ l3fwd_lpm_process_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
>  	const int32_t k = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(nb_rx, FWDSTEP);
>  	const int32_t m = nb_rx % FWDSTEP;
> 
> -	if (k) {
> -		for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i],
> -							void *));
> -		}
> -		for (j = 0; j != k - FWDSTEP; j += FWDSTEP) {
> -			for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
> -				rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(
> -						pkts_burst[j + i + FWDSTEP],
> -						void *));
> -			}
> +	/* The number of packets is small. Prefetch all packets. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nb_rx; i++)
> +		rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i], void *));
> 
> +	if (k) {
> +		for (j = 0; j != k; j += FWDSTEP) {
>  			processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
>  			processx4_step2(qconf, dip, ipv4_flag, portid,
>  					&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
>  			if (do_step3)
>  				processx4_step3(&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
>  		}
> -
> -		processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
> -		processx4_step2(qconf, dip, ipv4_flag, portid, &pkts_burst[j],
> -				&dst_port[j]);
> -		if (do_step3)
> -			processx4_step3(&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
> -
> -		j += FWDSTEP;
>  	}
> 
>  	if (m) {
> -		/* Prefetch last up to 3 packets one by one */
> -		switch (m) {
> -		case 3:
> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
> -							void *));
> -			j++;
> -			/* fallthrough */
> -		case 2:
> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
> -							void *));
> -			j++;
> -			/* fallthrough */
> -		case 1:
> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
> -							void *));
> -			j++;
> -		}
> -		j -= m;
>  		/* Classify last up to 3 packets one by one */
>  		switch (m) {
>  		case 3:
> --
> 2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch
  2025-01-08 13:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2025-01-09 11:31   ` huangdengdui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: huangdengdui @ 2025-01-09 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konstantin Ananyev, dev
  Cc: wathsala.vithanage, stephen, liuyonglong, Fengchengwen, haijie,
	lihuisong (C)


On 2025/1/8 21:42, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>> The prefetch window depending on the hardware platform. The current prefetch
>> policy may not be applicable to all platforms. In most cases, the number of
>> packets received by Rx burst is small (64 is used in most performance reports).
>> In L3fwd, the maximum value cannot exceed 512. Therefore, prefetching all
>> packets before processing can achieve better performance.
> 
> As you mentioned 'prefetch' behavior differs a lot from one HW platform to another.
> So it could easily be that changes you suggesting will cause performance
> boost on one platform and degradation on another.
> In fact, right now l3fwd 'prefetch' usage is a bit of mess:
> - l3fwd_lpm_neon.h uses  FWDSTEP as a prefetch window.
> - l3fwd_fib.c uses FIB_PREFETCH_OFFSET for that purpose
> - rest of the code uses either PREFETCH_OFFSET or doesn't use 'prefetch' at all
>  
> Probably what we need here is some unified approach:
> configurable at run-time prefetch_window_size that all code-paths will obey. 

Agreed, I'll add a parameter to configure the prefetch window.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h | 42 ++++-----------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
>> index 3c1f827424..0b51782b8c 100644
>> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
>> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
>> @@ -91,53 +91,21 @@ l3fwd_lpm_process_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
>>  	const int32_t k = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(nb_rx, FWDSTEP);
>>  	const int32_t m = nb_rx % FWDSTEP;
>>
>> -	if (k) {
>> -		for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
>> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i],
>> -							void *));
>> -		}
>> -		for (j = 0; j != k - FWDSTEP; j += FWDSTEP) {
>> -			for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
>> -				rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(
>> -						pkts_burst[j + i + FWDSTEP],
>> -						void *));
>> -			}
>> +	/* The number of packets is small. Prefetch all packets. */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nb_rx; i++)
>> +		rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i], void *));
>>
>> +	if (k) {
>> +		for (j = 0; j != k; j += FWDSTEP) {
>>  			processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
>>  			processx4_step2(qconf, dip, ipv4_flag, portid,
>>  					&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
>>  			if (do_step3)
>>  				processx4_step3(&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
>>  		}
>> -
>> -		processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
>> -		processx4_step2(qconf, dip, ipv4_flag, portid, &pkts_burst[j],
>> -				&dst_port[j]);
>> -		if (do_step3)
>> -			processx4_step3(&pkts_burst[j], &dst_port[j]);
>> -
>> -		j += FWDSTEP;
>>  	}
>>
>>  	if (m) {
>> -		/* Prefetch last up to 3 packets one by one */
>> -		switch (m) {
>> -		case 3:
>> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
>> -							void *));
>> -			j++;
>> -			/* fallthrough */
>> -		case 2:
>> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
>> -							void *));
>> -			j++;
>> -			/* fallthrough */
>> -		case 1:
>> -			rte_prefetch0(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
>> -							void *));
>> -			j++;
>> -		}
>> -		j -= m;
>>  		/* Classify last up to 3 packets one by one */
>>  		switch (m) {
>>  		case 3:
>> --
>> 2.33.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-09 11:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-25  7:53 [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: optimize packet prefetch Dengdui Huang
2024-12-25 21:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-08 13:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-01-09 11:31   ` huangdengdui

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).