From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202C8A04AC; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:59:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134D81C0D6; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:59:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11341C0D4 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A462207D; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:59:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:59:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=5zxOWSXbzrvjMHNoK53OEQQfev4OYR6fo8+Mik4mSsA=; b=pDqVvdpp0PwQ srT+N9IEXIECwIVzGLQq2pR5dpO6nVLEnDbhwv6C64FOicecgdoBQJID4d9o4TJ/ 9U9ZWNStvB+ez5V8W+Bb4GA60rEAm7vKwWgyXG+owTGSxl1VZ8ArJSYoSNmRuU0b fS/eBh+AfwGOeTlK6Q/4SdE6aBcE/hU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=5zxOWSXbzrvjMHNoK53OEQQfev4OYR6fo8+Mik4mS sA=; b=R41ebmG7nsdNZ9kU2v+oVkW5sAM6mztvQOjYdGAigRgynpq+6TmUxZXZd 1kps02CmXAps0KTIZOrGXHGBmh+19xjSTl102UlmgjeRiqkdEgvHEbXKeGHnSB9x 8wVmFwuBDWXpfQOGWjqgJkRb91cyEH6nUxU22/kzh2QRDjJXiWBr/qnWnskPw8nJ pdLkBi3Hx3Uz+GPkohHyaf1qpIjvDq9qUm/jd+8DMSOLXjgauht20xatK4aJTOXF L4Ixhu4gMgCt+8QQpac7NGmff7i2rAb2G+o7EI4KChLW0hWB/YFd19MauvXhuhm9 BDAmDFQnrVs4pF/r2aFpfBmlHnLjQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddujedgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpehtrhgrvhhishdqtghirdgtohhmnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedr udekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonh drnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EE95F306005F; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:59:02 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" , David Marchand , Aaron Conole Cc: dev , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:59:01 +0100 Message-ID: <6844395.SDEZyq9uXK@xps> In-Reply-To: <455E10571F3D08449B101F4522C6CA6763E3E537@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <2217498.R0Y2sklYZj@xps> <455E10571F3D08449B101F4522C6CA6763E3E537@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/12] lib: add RIB and FIB liraries X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/11/2019 12:53, Medvedkin, Vladimir: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 06/11/2019 06:50, David Marchand: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:14 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Applied, thanks > > > > > > The added tests are timeouting: > > > https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/253293904 > > > 47/86 DPDK:fast-tests / rib_autotest TIMEOUT 30.01 s > > > 48/86 DPDK:fast-tests / rib6_autotest TIMEOUT 30.01 s > > > > Vladimir, the slow test were supposed to be moved out of fast tests. > > Please can you fix it quickly? > > Yes, I'll send a fix now. > In v6 I split only fib_autotests, rib_autotests was not so slow in our CI. The goal is to have fast tests that developers can run frequently without being annoyed. I think the whole run should be below a minute. It means a single test case should not exceed one second ideally. Aaron, we should make a status about test duration, agree on a policy and make a plan to apply such policy.