From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E8B8032 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:00:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r20so36675626wiv.2 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:00:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=MMljX4+6WQWlxVutV6Sw8S+D3C4PJzvTKUZlqII6SPE=; b=R9UGw3JVByOZNcPn0O8Pp/f/TME4JmJwI7mf6jPAaBYSDbaUtsQmXRZELYmvOUhIfy po6rsbh2IjI4MW7vUKXJyc41P7LckaCpYKWnqKcumseYpdnfwKxB8V//PshlBPHoighS CZijRgvpMEplLV2On/BYRSD0nW4ZXhHQ66kcBp9642miFr0RllT/4QktK7Qd7aMsrraX VinB0r6ofq11CN/E1Ad+yVRijIlC/mydqgI/5oGhDoeHyzJdvNe3Tp3kosjUBt0aRtyK UjVkaNcz3T3HJiBSJ9do70hhEk8QH8K+SBBBTysgb7qAtT6bajqszn4356uIHWJyR3R7 KxSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQleQwKERzhgEll2PRaxCyMMz3tssofslCHJFf4pw5l0nCOkG2PPdvi4FL1LYcz7zETOvj15 X-Received: by 10.181.13.106 with SMTP id ex10mr109060279wid.36.1417708824519; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm41046167wjb.34.2014.12.04.08.00.22 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:00:23 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:59:59 +0100 Message-ID: <6950163.rWPXMLohSt@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.17.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20141204153256.GE16249@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1417688048-23076-1-git-send-email-chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1795169.cqFrYtuj77@xps13> <20141204153256.GE16249@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix KNI compiling issue on IBM Power X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:00:25 -0000 2014-12-04 10:32, Neil Horman: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2014-12-04 08:29, Neil Horman: > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > Because of different cache line size, the alignment of struct > > > > > rte_kni_mbuf in rte_kni_common.h doesn't work on IBM Power. This patch > > > > > changed from 64 to RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE micro to do the alignment. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> > > > > > > > > Applied > > > > > > > Woah! Slow down here, I'm not sure if this makes sense to fix his way. The > > > exact same ifndef/define/endif construct is used for this macro in rte_memory.h. > > > Currently their defined to the same vaule, but if that ever changes, this macro > > > will return different values based on the order in which header files are > > > included. That doesn't seem appropriate at all. > > > > I agree (was my comment) but the patch was applied as a hot fix. > > A better fix has to be found for DPDK 2.0. > > Do you agree this fix is enough for DPDK 1.8 release? > > > I really don't like the idea of hacks like this being used. It's not really a hack to replace a hardcoded value by a constant. I think you should agree it's better (but not perfect). > Truthfully, I would rather the KNI just not be built on power for now, > it is after all a new feature for which not everything works yet (e.g. the > acl library and the ixgbe rxtx vec code). > With this in place, KNI will build now, but it means that anything > changes cache line sizes until it gets fixed properly runs the risk of > introducing wierd behavioral issues at compile time. It was also the case before: 64 was hardcoded for KNI. > I'm also concerned about the fact that, since we have no bug tracker for DPDK, > indicating that there will be an improved fix in 2.0 isn't really a guarantee, > in that it requires that someone remember to do it. Please be confident that I keep it noted and I'll do what I can to have it properly fixed. By the way, submitting a fix now would store the need in patchwork. > > > > I wonder if we could try to guess the cache line size instead of > > > > configuring it in many places. > > > > Maybe we could use something like sysconf(_SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE)? > > > > > > > This is a good idea, but I think its a bit broken for a few reasons: > > > > > > 1) _SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE I don't think is POSIX mandated, so there is every > > > possibility that the above won't work on BSD > > > > > > 2) While getting the cache line size dynamically is a great idea, dpdk has > > > several locations that size structures based on processor cache line size, which > > > implicitly requires a static cache line definition. > > > > It can be guessed dynamically in the first build step (kind of configure). > > > That would work, though that seems like cause to really start redesigning the > build system to use autoconf/automake so we can run utilities to do that sort of > thing more easily (not opposed to that mind you, just illustrating that its more > work) I'm convinced we need to work on the build system but it's another discussion for next weeks. Speaking about that, the AF_PACKET PMD cannot be enabled because dependencies are not checked before building it. > > > It seems the right thing to do, in my mind is to define RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE per > > > arch (perhaps in common/include/arch/<arch>/rte_<something>.h), then just let > > > the build break if a given arch doesn't define it (i.e. make definig that value > > > an arch reqirement). > > > > It's the other option. For IBM Power, it's currently overwritten in the Makefile: > > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/mk/arch/ppc_64/rte.vars.mk > > > Thats a sensible solution in my mind, though it is limited by the assumption > that any given arch has only a single cache line size (I dno't think thats a > problem, but it might be). If it is, the dynamic solution above is superior. I think we won't solve the hypothetical problem of heterogeneous CPUs in first step. I'd like to start with your proposal of a arch variable. -- Thomas