From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116BF1B052 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:00:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B4721070; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:00:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=5RliftLUxFjN/m/v5NAscYTf6x CoysE5WmwHOpELgO0=; b=Bcyi/Xl2XtVDEw98G4wACrnu8Xg3eqnpgKMFccu0sK dt/GN/Yp0HLRRZCufO/LqqHhYB2/c5IuLZoiJSx5RQpSQhQmo2Qxj36eQ3WlvXnC iZztHJYCeChurTJcjo5xBKFhyg9bgjqwBBriW0gd63ngOtPpei7UGIUT0xoPgUnI I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=5Rlift LUxFjN/m/v5NAscYTf6xCoysE5WmwHOpELgO0=; b=izpinDmFizSZyUEpckKnkm ZX89ylHIvVccUDG9wd+9FbYq/N5w+pqMOQnH2cpxYo39JKrg65HNJhUn9Twrejco S8EqYDnGn/2M8fVvvogULd0jiTJE08vi3LqZj8TYtIrPSalf6jzi0KDq9YWsvy9k fDDSIeUwgr6hT0L7myzcLwSxObchjSbz3q5CZAGz85KbbN9W3n4NRZLC5p00jhNm nF10tPEojDoiQTeFRM1zAjDcn/ezIVHoymuqruxd+rZBPuVQWgrVhT+6bx30qYbw kZ8LumGmgfEHpshua7o5ppxXeJ9ocjyUf2Fzv1CjNxar4a2DUv8ZCILML90nk+sQ == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5DDE77E697; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:00:44 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jeff Guo Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, jblunck@infradead.org, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, motih@mellanox.com Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:00:12 +0100 Message-ID: <6977991.UJJFCEQyNF@xps> In-Reply-To: <1516013331-18939-2-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> References: <1515679534-22473-2-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> <1516013331-18939-1-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> <1516013331-18939-2-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V11 2/3] eal: add uevent pass and process function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:00:45 -0000 15/01/2018 11:48, Jeff Guo: > +enum rte_dev_event_subsystem { > + RTE_DEV_EVENT_SUBSYSTEM_UIO, > + RTE_DEV_EVENT_SUBSYSTEM_VFIO, > + RTE_DEV_EVENT_SUBSYSTEM_PCI, > + RTE_DEV_EVENT_SUBSYSTEM_MAX > +}; I still don't understand this classification, mixing PCI and VFIO at the same level.