From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB57A8D95
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:08:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 06:08:54 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,689,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="828236557"
Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 06:08:55 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.208) by
 fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 06:08:54 -0700
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by
 fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 06:08:53 -0700
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.253]) by
 SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.96]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:08:52 +0800
From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: "Zhu, Heqing" <heqing.zhu@intel.com>, Stephen Hemminger
 <stephen@networkplumber.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog
Thread-Index: AQHRB5LJxQ/FoB4Ra0u5glYkahw8uZ5s5JuAgAEzXPA=
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:08:51 +0000
Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090209FB05@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3>
 <CAD16F236028A64DBBC0158B1636EA4511C37444@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD16F236028A64DBBC0158B1636EA4511C37444@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:08:56 -0000

Hi Hemminger,
+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhu, Heqing
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 10:47 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger; Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog
>=20
> +1
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 5:44 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog
>=20
> There are currently 428 patches in New state in DPDK patchwork.
>=20
> Thomas, could you start reducing that backlog?
> The simplest solution would be to merge some of the big patch series from=
 Intel
> for the base drivers, then reviewers can focus on the other patches.
I think Thomas still needs some reason. Would you like to ack my patches fo=
r e1000 base driver :)