From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5B98E7C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:31:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2015 01:31:43 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,701,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="583612691"
Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2015 01:31:44 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx119.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.207) by
 fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:31:43 -0700
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by
 FMSMSX119.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:31:43 -0700
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.253]) by
 SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.96]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:31:41 +0800
From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3] i40e: Add a workaround to drop flow control frames
 from VFs
Thread-Index: AQHRCjfgg3G8v5/bIkmsMqSwDQlGt55yfJfw
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:31:40 +0000
Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909020A04A6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1444720729-788-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
 <1445236317-8138-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1445236317-8138-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Pei, Yulong" <yulong.pei@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e: Add a workaround to drop flow
 control frames from VFs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:31:45 -0000

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 2:32 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing; Lu, Wenzhuo; Pei, Yulong
> Subject: [PATCH v3] i40e: Add a workaround to drop flow control frames
> from VFs
>=20
> This patch adds a workaround to drop flow control frames from being
> transmitted from VSIs.
> With this patch in place a malicious VF cannot send flow control or PFC
> packets out on the wire.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>