From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740A6B62
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  1 Feb 2016 02:56:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2016 17:56:35 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,378,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="905503645"
Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2016 17:56:35 -0800
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by
 FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:56:33 -0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.172]) by
 SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.117]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:56:33 +0800
From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] support E-tag offloading and forwarding
 on	Intel X550 NIC
Thread-Index: AQHRWmNWWwijwDv6506hljYJ7HpcTJ8WY8FA//+EOgCAAIq3cA==
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:56:32 +0000
Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090342608B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1454051035-25757-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
 <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028622F260A3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090342601B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20160201013948.GZ4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160201013948.GZ4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] support E-tag offloading and forwarding
 on	Intel X550 NIC
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 01:56:36 -0000

Hi Yuanhan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 9:40 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: Qiu, Michael; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] support E-tag offloading and forwardi=
ng on
> Intel X550 NIC
>=20
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:04:52AM +0000, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Qiu, Michael
> > > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 3:16 PM
> > > To: Lu, Wenzhuo; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] support E-tag offloading and
> > > forwarding on Intel X550 NIC
> > >
> > > Hi, Wenzhuo
> > >
> > > Better to explain what E-tag is, so that reviewers could known it.
> > Yes, it's better. But not sure where should I add this info. In release=
 note or just
> cover letter? Any suggestion? Thanks.
>=20
> It should be done in the first patch introduced E-tag, so that it will be=
 in the git
> log history. And of course, it does no harm at all to mention (briefly) i=
t again in
> cover letter, so that reviewer/maintainer has a brief understanding of yo=
ur
> whole patchset first.
>=20
> 	--yliu
Thanks for the suggestion!