From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75EE568C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:25:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2016 23:25:45 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,420,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="922353407"
Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2016 23:25:45 -0700
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by
 fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:25:44 -0700
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.232]) by
 SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:25:42 +0800
From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
CC: Marc Sune <marcdevel@gmail.com>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
 "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>, "Ananyev, Konstantin"
 <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "Richardson, Bruce"
 <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Glynn, Michael J" <michael.j.glynn@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v13 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring
Thread-Index: AQHRhv6/fvl90xaefEmWli/Wqljl1J9xN3mAgAHl6YA=
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 06:25:40 +0000
Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC090903440841@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1458934950-23333-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <1458955640-22951-1-git-send-email-marcdevel@gmail.com>
 <1974870.rokCOitPGA@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <1974870.rokCOitPGA@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
	refactoring
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 06:25:46 -0000

Hi Thomas, Marc,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 5:23 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Marc Sune; Xu, Qian Q; Xing, Beilei; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo=
;
> Richardson, Bruce; Glynn, Michael J
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring
>=20
> 2016-03-26 02:27, Marc Sune:
> > There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
> > autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6).
> > I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework.
> >
> > The capabilities must be adapted per device. It can be improved in a
> > separate patch.
> >
> > It will be integrated in 16.04-rc3.
> > Please test and review shortly, thanks!
>=20
> Still no feedback for e1000 and i40e devices.
> Should we consider it is working fine?
I've tried i350 with this patch set. At least the basic rx/tx function is w=
orking.
But it's a big patch, I still have some questions. I'll comment soon.