From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4C31B016 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 03:07:45 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2018 18:07:44 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,342,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="9482767" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2018 18:07:44 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:07:44 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by FMSMSX125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:07:44 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.189]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.159]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:07:41 +0800 From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" To: Stephen Hemminger , "Yigit, Ferruh" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Wu, Jingjing" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/14] net/avf: initialization of avf PMD Thread-Index: AQHTidpKlw3Wv+TbfkWg1e/zRuy3qaNs02SAgAEWzbA= Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 02:07:41 +0000 Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B70E202@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1515388414-16214-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1515564961-79227-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1515564961-79227-3-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <20180110091525.7f6abb3b@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20180110091525.7f6abb3b@xeon-e3> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/14] net/avf: initialization of avf PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 02:07:47 -0000 Hi Stephen, > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:15 AM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/14] net/avf: initialization of avf P= MD >=20 > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:15:49 +0800 > Wenzhuo Lu wrote: >=20 > > + > > +#define AVF_MAX_NUM_QUEUES 16 > > +/* Vlan table size */ > > +#define AVF_VLAN_TB_SIZE (4096 / (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(uint= 32_t))) >=20 > You could use ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID (which is 4095). > Also it is most efficient if bit tables use unsigned long to access. Thanks for the suggestion. I found this macro is useless. I'd like just removing it. Hi Ferruh, As this patch set is accepted to next-net, I can sent a fixes patch for thi= s change. Is it OK? Would you like helping merge the fixes to the original = patch? Thanks.