DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ding, HengX" <hengx.ding@intel.com>
To: "Ding, HengX" <hengx.ding@intel.com>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] run ip_fragmentation with cores in different socket will cause core dump
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 07:41:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6EBE0505FB6FBE47AB60080228528452519690E7@CDSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)


The following command will cause ip_fragmentation app fail:
examples/ip_fragmentation/build/ip_fragmentation -c 0x40002 -n 4 -- -p 0x3 -q 2
while setting core mask to 0x2 or 0x40000 will not cause this issue.

error message is shown below:

EAL:   Not managed by a supported kernel driver, skipped
IP_FRAG: Creating direct mempool on socket 0
IP_FRAG: Creating indirect mempool on socket 0
IP_FRAG: Creating LPM table on socket 0
IP_FRAG: Creating LPM6 table on socket 0
IP_FRAG: Creating direct mempool on socket 1
IP_FRAG: Creating indirect mempool on socket 1
IP_FRAG: Creating LPM table on socket 1
IP_FRAG: Creating LPM6 table on socket 1
IP_FRAG: Cannot create LPM table
PANIC in main():
Cannot initialize memory structures!
5: [examples/ip_fragmentation/build/ip_fragmentation() [0x42df85]]
4: [/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x3a8a421d65]]
3: [examples/ip_fragmentation/build/ip_fragmentation() [0x42d163]]
2: [examples/ip_fragmentation/build/ip_fragmentation(__rte_panic+0xc9) [0x426c0c]]
1: [examples/ip_fragmentation/build/ip_fragmentation(rte_dump_stack+0x1a) [0x4980aa]]
Aborted (core dumped)

And the bisect result:

f82f705b635d31a63446a16bc4526dbebf293c5a is the first bad commit
commit f82f705b635d31a63446a16bc4526dbebf293c5a
Author: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 6 15:27:58 2016 +0200

    lpm: fix allocation of an existing object

    Change rte_lpm*_create() functions to return NULL and set rte_errno to
   EEXIST when the object name already exists. This is the behavior
    described in the API documentation in the header file.

    These functions were returning a pointer to the existing object in that
    case, but it is a problem as the caller did not know if the object had
    to be freed or not.

    Doing this change also makes the lpm API more consistent with the other
    APIs (mempool, rings, ...).

    Fixes: 916e4f4f4e ("memory: fix for multi process support")

    Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
    Acked-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

:040000 040000 a7450772f279b8d459c96dd7a7b193d01bb4ecf6 0a41cee86a23d7968218183c93a4b60a6bfff1c3 M      app
:040000 040000 88dd7b9fadc50cbf7824e28195d892635d45581d 72e3179c9835c6bea6909a29a56a1c7835540368 M      doc
:040000 040000 8478c771116ac841eeca65c6b08e263229a96d57 76e2294cca653e366456a73755efbbff687630d2 M      lib


Thanks
Ding Heng

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-13  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-13  7:41 Ding, HengX [this message]
2016-06-13  8:46 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13  9:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples: fix duplicated lpm6 name Olivier Matz
2016-06-15 14:30     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6EBE0505FB6FBE47AB60080228528452519690E7@CDSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=hengx.ding@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).