From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B352AA0A0F;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:46:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375C740E01;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:46:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3ED40DF6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:45:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55])
 by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GF5Fy5lr4z73gT;
 Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:41:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by
 dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id
 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:45:56 +0800
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <6ac31917-8ae6-b61f-c0c1-07d907066752@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:45:56 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To
 dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102)
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Question about 'rxm->hash.rss' and 'mb->hash.fdir'
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, all
	one question about 'rxm->hash.rss' and 'mb->hash.fdir'.

	In Rx recv packets function,
	'rxm->hash.rss' will report rss hash result from Rx desc.
	'rxm->hash.fdir' will report filter identifier from Rx desc.

	But function implementation differs from some PMDs. for example:
	i40e, MLX5 report the two at the same time if pkt_flags is set,like:
******************************************
		if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH) {
			rxm->hash.rss = 			rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxd.wb.qword0.hi_dword.rss);
		}
		if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) {
			mb->hash.fdir.hi =
		rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.qword3.hi_dword.fd_id);
		}
********************************************

	While, ixgbe only report one of the two. like:
******************************************
		if (likely(pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH))
			mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(
			    rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.rss);
		else if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) {
			mb->hash.fdir.hash = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
			    rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum) &
			    IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK;
			mb->hash.fdir.id = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
			    rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id);
		}
********************************************
	So, what is application scenario for 'rxm->hash.rss' and 
'mb->hash.fdir', that is, why the two should be reported? How about 
reporting the two at the same time?
	Thanks for  your reply.