DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, Liang Ma <liang.j.ma@intel.com>,
	Peter Mccarthy <peter.mccarthy@intel.com>,
	Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Alfredo Cardigliano <cardigliano@ntop.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: ignore missing field initializers warning
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:55:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b022ebe-0c6e-df76-bb83-90f5774be721@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200121143531.2677911-1-thomas@monjalon.net>

On 1/21/2020 2:35 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Three warnings are commonly disabled in DPDK with make and meson:
> 	* address-of-packed-member
> 		always disabled
> 	* missing-field-initializers
> 		disabled with meson
> 		disabled with make + clang or make + gcc < 4.7
> 		disabled with make + gcc <= 5 for test files and event drivers
> 	* packed-not-aligned
> 		disabled with meson
> 
> This change is removing exceptions for missing-field-initializers.
> As it is always disabled, some redundant configs are cleaned up.
> 
> Now the situation is:
> 	* address-of-packed-member
> 		always disabled
> 	* missing-field-initializers
> 		always disabled
> 	* packed-not-aligned
> 		disabled with meson
> 
> It could alternatively be decided to disable missing-field-initializers
> only for old gcc (< 6).

I am not sure if we ever want 'missing-field-initializers' warnings, so +1 to
drop it without version check as it is done in this patch.

> 
> The warning packed-not-aligned is not modified in this change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-21 14:35 Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-21 15:55 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-02-06  2:13   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6b022ebe-0c6e-df76-bb83-90f5774be721@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=cardigliano@ntop.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=liang.j.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=peter.mccarthy@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).