From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0244A0A02; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:33:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B53C40686; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:33:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEEA40143 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:33:28 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: 2LKL1znumSDcm0Krpi42yXy7rJxR+MKdn60AIbjAcCIkqc2PovetVwRRynUqdgRXPapV4s/fIx N/e/JP9yn64w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9990"; a="181773544" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="181773544" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2021 06:33:27 -0700 IronPort-SDR: C6hbXWQeCChKUIY2EHWjHe3CnZOvnG88DFleq7N2BufSRWW3FvYeyChLs4nalwoKe7X9+Iq9DY k6F0wvgOXGxg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="412604737" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.210.36]) ([10.213.210.36]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2021 06:33:26 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org References: <20210209152643.1832506-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20210521133038.1165002-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: Ferruh Yigit X-User: ferruhy Message-ID: <6c6611da-22a0-6c6d-6207-5c73ecc51ff7@intel.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:33:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210521133038.1165002-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] devtools: check %l format specifier X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 5/21/2021 2:30 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > From: Ferruh Yigit > > %lx or %llx tend to be wrong for 32-bit platform > if used for fixed size variable like uint64_t. > A checkpatch warning will avoid this common mistake. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Ack. Thanks for update.