From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E4169D8 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:02:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n11so88433103wma.1 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:02:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d17QD3OHXZ5e++5pdrD0JFoyL7Z86Tpd+OdnQvsZSpw=; b=WbjHkxJ+UZH9Tsv8JE56YIvPkoLeLoH0/ZG8XQKgsgGzqNS0IUgrQuMfNvrpU6iZNA UTc2X5jYiO2mvZoqCxlULzN83okw4yzyxhl2ZfYuwe9I1MDSuLzIq3QrV0tRJTFou+8e Zb6Dvf7aGPdKD1dTDNpt8T4UH6Xm1FX+2DMz7gpyn2rlRetQo7QyCFIoGahmrleweLxN li3z4GVdgPdPID0703BbtEUbkCkUQm24TSc3M4lzl6xZnl9wyEURilzlVw4xsO+pCaqk FkumWBYDB7ZJ7oGnaf5sl1GooNNSHavKuJWzeXxnL2aNjM1fP/INKL0viPQ6kzENBf/E ybBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d17QD3OHXZ5e++5pdrD0JFoyL7Z86Tpd+OdnQvsZSpw=; b=fdj4tglYXYKXCcEWUmaFlC7PPQ6QIUgQxJ5v276E66vH/vVK5o411XyswEjpSBneF1 QU7brYBUyvm/r++YV8zjgqDFpjRAlEvJfCtiD9oWEr8NuMe2HdLk1m/oHQQ/t9jlZ/hN +bK8b70jRr/+vkUDktodfNKnYX4mTRVRZDQImXuJgxwVdQ9eKg74GwUVLu1Tuv/tB7TJ DIhQcmRx2Eg7EyZlVkZFqs9kivmd4G15kPj59c35QS1InEL1Qk5R0Z0GjnCLPaAujj7p OZQdHzhziKvphmznvbbsj5yOewFQRPY2N3V5i3LngWkBcR+8hdGLZDES2hYcdEIJ/41Q w8Ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1oO5Aol4aJQflFYj43E9FXRorPjY9Q1woLMRSgL7zEXWfl6KVurtdUntlXQvlb/36H X-Received: by 10.28.173.2 with SMTP id w2mr19599758wme.117.1489586547459; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.87] ([80.215.227.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v186sm638488wmv.2.2017.03.15.07.02.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:02:26 -0700 (PDT) To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , "Legacy, Allain (Wind River)" References: <1488414008-162839-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com> <1489432593-32390-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com> <4b3a0ff4-3d19-8e4b-0cbf-2a08e6433285@6wind.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA7231E927@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Jolliffe, Ian (Wind River)" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Mcnamara, John" , "Wiles, Keith" , "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" , "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "3chas3@gmail.com" <3chas3@gmail.com> From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <6cc24fff-f5db-944e-60eb-ec8be8042d8e@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:02:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA7231E927@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] Wind River Systems AVP PMD vs virtio? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:02:28 -0000 Le 15/03/2017 à 05:10, O'Driscoll, Tim a écrit : >> so, still an nack because: >> - no performance data of avp vs virtio, > I don't think it should be a requirement for Allain to provide performance data in order to justify getting this accepted into DPDK. Keith pointed out in a previous comment on this patch set that even if performance is the same as virtio, there might still be other reasons why people would want to use it. > >> - 2013 is gone, >> - it unfocuses from virtio. Tim, you get it wrong, it IS the major point: if AVP is good in performance, then an alternative to virtio is needed. Please, stop turning around the topic, and send facts/numbers that demonstrate that there is a value in having alternative to virtio. Currently, the only argument is a code developed in 2013 needs to be upstreamed because vhost-user was not available in 2013. Best regards, Vincent