From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35C9A0C4E;
	Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:58:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8C4411FB;
	Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:58:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A5B4119C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:58:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55])
 by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HZnYf6JpczZcFQ;
 Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:56:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by
 dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id
 15.1.2308.15; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:58:42 +0800
From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
CC: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>, Ferruh Yigit
 <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
References: <4de1abc6-69ea-2fb8-19bf-1a2ab480cbd8@huawei.com>
 <a9b909db-8530-5c6c-80ba-3a4b55d698a0@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <6cd232ec-3683-6774-38b1-c26230d989c9@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:58:42 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a9b909db-8530-5c6c-80ba-3a4b55d698a0@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To
 dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102)
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, Ferruh, Thomas,
	any comments?

在 2021/10/19 19:52, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
> Hi, anyone could give me a reply? thanks.
> 
> 在 2021/10/14 10:13, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>> Hi, Declan Doherty,
>>      In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
>> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
>> is propagated to all slaves.
>>
>> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is 
>> propagated only to primary slave.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
>> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
>> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
>>
>>      Hope for your reply.
>>      Best Wishes.
>> .
> .