DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:15:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e507daa-a34b-4e3d-94fa-1560fc9cfdc6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCTFhfkYJUbYALMm@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 5/14/2025 6:32 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:54:27PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>> The `rdh` (read head) field in the `ixgbe_rx_queue` struct is not used
>> anywhere in the codebase, and can be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> 
> With the one comment below fixed.
> 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 9 ++-------
>>   drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 1 -
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>> index 95c80ac1b8..0c07ce3186 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
>> @@ -3296,17 +3296,12 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Modified to setup VFRDT for Virtual Function
>>   	 */
>> -	if (ixgbe_is_vf(dev)) {
>> +	if (ixgbe_is_vf(dev))
>>   		rxq->rdt_reg_addr =
>>   			IXGBE_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, IXGBE_VFRDT(queue_idx));
>> -		rxq->rdh_reg_addr =
>> -			IXGBE_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, IXGBE_VFRDH(queue_idx));
>> -	} else {
>> +	else
>>   		rxq->rdt_reg_addr =
>>   			IXGBE_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, IXGBE_RDT(rxq->reg_idx));
>> -		rxq->rdh_reg_addr =
>> -			IXGBE_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, IXGBE_RDH(rxq->reg_idx));
>> -	}
>>   
> 
> Unrelated code change. Please remove from this patch in any subsequent
> versions - it's not worth fixing this unless we are otherwise modifying
> this function.

It was removed because we either keep rdh_reg_addr in common Rx queue 
structure, or we get rid of both the field and all its usages. If we 
don't remove this, we'll have to include rdh_reg_addr in common Rx queue 
structure and since it's not used anywhere except here it would be 
pretty pointless to do so.

> 
>>   	rxq->rx_ring_phys_addr = rz->iova;
>>   	rxq->rx_ring = (union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *) rz->addr;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>> index 641f982b01..20a5c5a0af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_queue {
>>   	volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *rx_ring; /**< RX ring virtual address. */
>>   	uint64_t            rx_ring_phys_addr; /**< RX ring DMA address. */
>>   	volatile uint32_t   *rdt_reg_addr; /**< RDT register address. */
>> -	volatile uint32_t   *rdh_reg_addr; /**< RDH register address. */
>>   	struct ixgbe_rx_entry *sw_ring; /**< address of RX software ring. */
>>   	struct ixgbe_scattered_rx_entry *sw_sc_ring; /**< address of scattered Rx software ring. */
>>   	struct rte_mbuf *pkt_first_seg; /**< First segment of current packet. */
>> -- 
>> 2.47.1
>>


-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 13:27 [PATCH v1 " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:39     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:45     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:52     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:09       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:55         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:56     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:59     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:11       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:57         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:56     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:58     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 11:07     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Bruce Richardson
2025-05-14 16:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:15     ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2025-05-15 12:58       ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e507daa-a34b-4e3d-94fa-1560fc9cfdc6@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).