DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
	"Jerin Jacob" <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: fix vfio mode
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 02:00:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e9922c5-9659-a42a-4213-700ebe1e5714@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171030080654.GF10890@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>

On 10/30/2017 1:06 AM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> Hi Jerin,
> 
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:50:52AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> The definition of VFIO_PRESENT is "eal_vfio.h", Fail to
>> include eal_vfio.h will result in disabling vfio.
>>
>> Fixes: 279b581c897d ("vfio: expose functions")
>>
> 
> Thanks for the fix, sorry for VFIO.
> I tried to let go of VFIO_PRESENT in the PCI patchset, unfortunately I did
> not do a good-enough job.
> 
> Instead of reinstating the dependency on the private eal_vfio.h header,
> I'd suggest replacing all VFIO_PRESENT references within the PCI bus by
> RTE_EAL_VFIO, and make the pci_vfio.c compilation depend on it within
> the linux Makefile. Something like:
> 
> ---8<---
> 
> grep -rl VFIO_PRESENT drivers/bus/pci/linux/ |while read -r file
> do sed -i 's;VFIO_PRESENT;RTE_EAL_VFIO;' $file
> done

VFIO_PRESENT is the combination of the if user enabled VFIO and if Linux kernel
supports it.

Why not add same check and VFIO_PRESENT definition to rte_vfio.h:

  --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_vfio.h
  +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_vfio.h
  @@ -34,7 +34,13 @@
   #ifndef _RTE_VFIO_H_
   #define _RTE_VFIO_H_

  +#if !defined(VFIO_PRESENT) && defined(RTE_EAL_VFIO)
  +#include <linux/version.h>
  +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 6, 0)
   #include <linux/vfio.h>
  +#define VFIO_PRESENT
  +#endif /* >= 3.6.0 */
  +#endif
  +
  +#ifdef VFIO_PRESENT

  ... Need to wrap here in case VFIO disabled ...

  #endif

> 
> patch -p1 <<___HERE
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/Makefile b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/Makefile
> index 77c5f97..b5b9c54 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/Makefile
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> 
>  SRCS += pci.c
>  SRCS += pci_uio.c
> +ifeq (\$(CONFIG_RTE_EAL_VFIO),y)
>  SRCS += pci_vfio.c
> +endif

+1

Also ?
  +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_EAL_VFIO),y)
   SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP) += eal_vfio.c
   SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP) += eal_vfio_mp_sync.c
  +endif

Build shouldn't broken when VFIO disabled form config

> 
>  CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE
> ___HERE
> 
> --->8---
> 
> Do you think it could work? If so, I think it would be preferable
> to re-including eal_vfio.h. Private EAL headers are bound to be removed
> from other subsystems at some point. I tried to start with VFIO, others
> should follow.
> 
>> Cc: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
>> index cdf810693..d0ce0207a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include "eal_private.h"
>>  #include "eal_filesystem.h"
>> +#include "eal_vfio.h"
>>  
>>  #include "private.h"
>>  #include "pci_init.h"
>> -- 
>> 2.14.3
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-30  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-28  6:20 Jerin Jacob
2017-10-30  8:06 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-10-30  9:00   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-10-30  9:17     ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-10-30  9:27       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-30 11:24         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-30 16:57           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 17:13             ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-10-30  9:10   ` Jerin Jacob
2017-10-30 12:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 12:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: warn user that VFIO is disabled Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 16:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] bus/pci: fix vfio mode Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 16:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: warn user that VFIO is disabled Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 17:31       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 17:26     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] bus/pci: fix vfio mode Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 19:07       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 22:32     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-31 12:03       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-10-31 16:58         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-31 18:21         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-31 14:11       ` Gaëtan Rivet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e9922c5-9659-a42a-4213-700ebe1e5714@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).