From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Shreesh Adiga <16567adigashreesh@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/crc: reduce usage of static arrays in net_crc_sse.c
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7068093.UjTJXf6HLC@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+-x59aDXS9-G=Yx3bUHj=XQX2Tjavkihu0w5r69P62y-g8Lpw@mail.gmail.com>
29/09/2025 18:28, Shreesh Adiga:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 8:28 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > 16/07/2025 12:34, Shreesh Adiga:
> > > Replace the clearing of lower 32 bits of XMM register with blend of
> > > zero register.
> > > Replace the clearing of upper 64 bits of XMM register with
> > _mm_move_epi64.
> > > Clang is able to optimize away the AND + memory operand with the
> > > above sequence, however GCC is still emitting the code for AND with
> > > memory operands which is being explicitly eliminated here.
> > >
> > > Additionally replace the 48 byte crc_xmm_shift_tab with the contents of
> > > shf_table which is 32 bytes, achieving the same functionality.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shreesh Adiga <16567adigashreesh@gmail.com>
> >
> > Sorry I'm not following.
> > Please could you start with defining the goal of this patch?
> > Is it a code simplification or a performance optimization?
>
> It is intended to be a minor performance optimization.
Please could you give some performance numbers in the commit log?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 10:34 Shreesh Adiga
2025-09-24 14:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-09-29 16:28 ` Shreesh Adiga
2025-10-01 7:55 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2025-10-01 10:24 ` Shreesh Adiga
2025-10-01 12:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7068093.UjTJXf6HLC@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=16567adigashreesh@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).