From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6FFA0C45; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B921B40696; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4996C4014F for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:00:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF973200991; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:00:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:00:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= eZWgcCqttWmTsP0eqgzrD431eVZGBk8SwLEXToOk3Bw=; b=6HjOaupsh1hoDID1 uXZ51iFE8VPseD7/ewvbSk5pE2UZo6guQ1DsEfKKfxgrlpM/DyraEz2MavuMhKoO 3kSNIFf7iOIEYrVCel1MHLfoo42rWcnu0fmCUYj1ZicxncGSN4rLueSuHtv2ctuW aM6WewTD2JIuBHxn/gJ+lITfAYrLPDJgy+an3acRqZxW+pNfXtwUGUjzLzzHWHfk zVtKhERI6kxPlU5+iFeqfWYDu+E2omkMqUhf33sP3w74G+BGM68B6kP4A10cXGc6 jOvS6BXAqwyWq/cd3y4i7InIwl1gGeMznTVcd5E5+z1PjNb5Z38Z91cGNb2V1F+f HRYBkg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=eZWgcCqttWmTsP0eqgzrD431eVZGBk8SwLEXToOk3 Bw=; b=g2MPhgZ0J05Y0SmlBYB8EDvBLZvk5pjjiEbrBc42Y87KCB8tZZsV+VgUd tqNYPfPUXChy+NRQMomOL19bQVcJtdsAjRvw4SEmFR1ExAHas6fKTrXLme135dab or8DS+o6P+PIq0XkDWfpbMxSmQdbqCAxlYdqdC+3znO2GMWa2mQkxSIfarRrLd8e gq61dlT7n3Q7wt3SwYbBLHC2G+TH84sF3LnIb8cMlFQWfLEWbtHB3BzSL6QmEbGF WhuXSn6eZVvlNqMe40Qq5vlUM09f9Nwxwo69noCniwBdNJWSwVuxNI2Jaa3aVxkn P41lATK2ZLeFrvTbucsLJUcfYarIQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrieeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrh hofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghi lhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurh ephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofho nhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepkeethedtieevhfeigeejleegudefjeehkeekteeuveeiuedvveeutdejveeh veetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepth hhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 05:00:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Min Hu (Connor)" Cc: Wenjun Wu , dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:00:22 +0200 Message-ID: <7111741.xbEYeWLQEA@thomas> In-Reply-To: <755d2db8-5261-9b72-a733-7e5a44f10fbe@huawei.com> References: <20210803083817.1243796-1-wenjun1.wu@intel.com> <2321455.Ov46Bg38My@thomas> <755d2db8-5261-9b72-a733-7e5a44f10fbe@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/22] backport feature support to DPDK 20.11 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/08/2021 10:48, Min Hu (Connor): > =E5=9C=A8 2021/8/4 15:54, Thomas Monjalon =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > 04/08/2021 03:20, Min Hu (Connor): > >> Hi, all, > >> Features could be backport to TLS version? It is surprising. > >=20 > > No it cannot, but you skipped the interesting part of the message: > > " > > They are not for LTS upstream, just for customer to cherrypick. > > " > Hi, Thomas, > "just for customer to cherrypick." -- what doet it mean? > It means that it tells users to backport the patches to 20.11 if they=20 > need the features? Yes anyone can use the patches from the mailing list on their own. > I cannot understand why this set of patches are sent to dev@dpdk.org ? Here the mailing list is used as "patch storage". In patchwork, the state is changed to "Not Applicable".