From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDFBCE7 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:22:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id g62so28359859wme.0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:22:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=gF2mOalDKZQoUnhmsT+kmN/alreYs3kY6n7psSyP5Lc=; b=RTRNfmac0kpy9WqdQCMo4X0a3ki+vWf3h6F1GaVB9NCydJk5tthmYxDger/wIkalmQ bOctnWsTBRrKTOFD8eulaku1vGBK47YZjgIdAaJYu5vdEg75P8iE8dbtbA/Spw6heJAu 75QBL5nc2umugqB3mn0obpAHDfjveDtlUezXILCAT6Kh41tUe+5OgFCEWK15MHuM8bL9 bPqWg7V73VP6hMSU8fzoOTrpifyPEi+ifilaEbWWXXLvorp8/Sj7TthDtHdBpIXLFttK iaIS4FY4cJhka16vWd4QWXozBdLWezZRGvrmhu+uAFVsWCna7uEcINoG8MtbKChelbFC AIaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=gF2mOalDKZQoUnhmsT+kmN/alreYs3kY6n7psSyP5Lc=; b=IlXFddYt/0t0BjUnu/+1BHEUEriCXJpW9VlXevAvoYgn5xI4ag/9w16cYWXzRI53ur kgTTyeGhzB3+ZOwzQXNOCc59kEnKvWJEZmCoMdNSFAHaS+BrHh7dcsdWgmq0OSETaSWB o+20IJH9Of/BhPV44ltbJn4JACuqmCcaya9PQXu5c/6a/QY/kCSNAvr4J5K/oMKOBh7Z SinAVyCIU9+Hghh0PuUPlgCVrqVnk4zWoMzOpz7B0OXW8l4oJpcFKZhjZ964r8WgWV2B UpUnB6UmUJ8lTPNMlwHWPc+55CCDd3mMWoUvnp2Z1SJV5dvS2HSa5UuP4OK+LTucfvk3 7jpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTpRihxER3x09BD0mLFxCoGTdE15f/tinilpqPyAgHxMxdh9k0TzGUi3wnTzqare/ZD X-Received: by 10.194.179.71 with SMTP id de7mr45999594wjc.119.1455207745836; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g126sm12366943wmf.16.2016.02.11.08.22.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:22:25 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Dave Neary Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:20:57 +0100 Message-ID: <7111981.Y5bUDIndo6@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56BCB340.6040208@redhat.com> References: <20160211030540.GB25680@hunt> <2593509.xiuDro8IbH@xps13> <56BCB340.6040208@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] thoughts on DPDK after a few days of reading sources X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:22:26 -0000 2016-02-11 11:13, Dave Neary: > Hi, > > On 02/11/2016 02:58 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-02-10 19:05, Seth Arnold: > > [...] > >> It's nearly impossible to solve issues without error reporting. Good > >> error reporting saves admins time and money. > > > > Until now, the errors were reported on the list and most often fixed quickly. > > While I agree we need a more formal process (a bug tracker), I think we must > > be noticed of new bugs on the mailing list. > > Since nobody was against the bugzilla proposal, a deployment will be planned. > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-August/023012.html > > I may have misunderstood Seth's comment, but it looked like he was > talking about checking errno after fopen and reporting the error with > perror or strerror in the event of a non-zero return. Maybe I misunderstood his comments. Anyway, after looking at his list of bugs, it appears that a bug tracker would be useful :)