From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC71A0C47;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:06:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3770C40E01;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:06:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DB940150
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60EEA7F530;
 Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:06:17 +0300 (MSK)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 60EEA7F530
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru;
 s=default; t=1634018777;
 bh=bkM6eN50IoQpcwD+fj/SIK4tLmrQeTtpGpanD5H/Z6A=;
 h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
 b=FCQ489KvKHNxadLueeNhwOl9QMad3QwevcUVYVt55qGTONALr0nDQ3VBwOtGr5PYF
 U0s4UUu834ACIafNZyh8Ax9twLupJ3D8d04Zl+YWCa9gpAIkIt4YYSO7RobvJq/ir1
 7ZI8GEKyRD1vZ/ZRK6o6nPPwgkW9Z/nQZzdsFQ4Y=
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@oss.nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Matan Azrad <matan@oss.nvidia.com>,
 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, mdr@ashroe.eu
References: <20210818090755.2419483-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
 <20210929145249.2176811-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
 <20210929145249.2176811-3-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> <1672428.zglYOQ0Mhn@thomas>
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Organization: OKTET Labs
Message-ID: <71377e77-7684-4576-c9d6-e8547ca2ba33@oktetlabs.ru>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:06:17 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1672428.zglYOQ0Mhn@thomas>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 10/5/21 7:39 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 29/09/2021 16:52, dkozlyuk@oss.nvidia.com:
>> From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@oss.nvidia.com>
>>
>> Mempool is a generic allocator that is not necessarily used for device
>> IO operations and its memory for DMA. Add MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO flag to mark
>> such mempools.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@oss.nvidia.com>
>> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst | 3 +++
>>  lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h              | 4 ++++
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> index f85dc99c8b..873beda633 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ API Changes
>> +* mempool: Added ``MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO`` flag to give a hint to DPDK components
>> +  that objects from this pool will not be used for device IO (e.g. DMA).
> 
> This is not a breaking change, but I am OK to add this note.
> Any other opinion?

Why is it in API changes section? Shouldn't it be in
"New Features"?