From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E75378E for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so122741714wme.0 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:42:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=7Jy26gVhC2+x6pPXwRcblyscElgAEnZZsoXhuCcaQnk=; b=Z648uosseJEQoS9xgWnaJsv9DB7CkMeTw3ZpnhGI10mRNMlkz6RZhUTao9UP92gbkd BpHnxhGJKIdjCkqBOiaChmjsYDZYgXZA/EjSfaR8ed9P6o6DG7AE5k7RtxPDavrRJR4x DB0GJnEuQj6pyz1eaJjDVQIypXol12WxcJRbvRPuOdewLuk4qDKrAllOWf3IEu0N+119 6wf1iCRq44f6ogNmI44mFc5wc//AaxezspEmCJW9hkvG1SP/71+TqQL2AYbD2b52aAcR j/NK07JDi9168N/Pbch7RkXXeoIsSy4y4t6+vCBKahN419a9TatMah7nzBDVy6whl8Sa r70w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=7Jy26gVhC2+x6pPXwRcblyscElgAEnZZsoXhuCcaQnk=; b=FGocWYHHu/xwtB1XVV+qBa1PadSqenwxt5CjqnnhyGM4Wdx2m8i8Na5K3dMH9nCqM/ fi9E8lXFQe7a04Fp/L0LIdrnAMstbm3MarONu7RWKAjDM6NLH5tdRWOxSdDTYIjUjewZ NFlhU+HxU4b0N6+WGhyzfOzAE38+46cBYE3yyEeAXan1YORAFl02+QR/T/j2ylNWDxmk ZYJEwbyWUsERHNWI+vhQkHznvlrvfqi3FgLJH3YqMA4RooA1u6Qw6DE+rgfk+nr+bT85 zJ9+Yl1nFJvAtbz56WPLL1yMi/GijLemsjBT5TB829/XlWSJhGfVagu+AIYet8C7p4iW XpRg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1nHjWDiLk3kaH+BhQzbGmLu/UPzL+7xzmBU1ohusEOaGUSc8dYonnPCRNwfvfKedbkul+ X-Received: by 10.28.20.149 with SMTP id 143mr6551072wmu.63.1446676938624; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:42:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet ([93.158.51.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p75sm5192422wmd.22.2015.11.04.14.42.16 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:42:18 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <3chas3@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 23:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: <7145730.ihAL5VqqiH@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1444830094.3494.59.camel@gmail.com> References: <1443798007-20122-1-git-send-email-3chas3@gmail.com> <561CFDDB.90601@6wind.com> <1444830094.3494.59.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] devargs: add blacklisting by linux interface name X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:42:19 -0000 2015-10-14 09:41, Charles Williams: > On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 14:49 +0200, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > For PCI devices that have several interfaces (I think it's the case for > > some Mellanox boards), maybe we should not store the interface name? > > I am not sure what you mean here. If a device has multiple ethernet > interfaces, then it should a have seperate PCI device address space for > each interface (I dont know of any DPDK drivers that don't make this > assumption as well). mlx4 and cxgbe?