From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, ophirmu@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: complete closing of port
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:44:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7172106.4TAESsr7Yr@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c85fe1fb-2135-b5c1-ffdc-ce19d1f4304c@solarflare.com>
10/10/2018 08:15, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 10/10/18 1:17 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > After closing a port, it cannot be restarted.
> > So there is no reason to not free all associated resources.
> >
> > The last step was done with rte_eth_dev_detach() which is deprecated.
> > Instead of blindly removing the associated rte_device, the driver should
> > check if no more port (ethdev, cryptodev, etc) is open for the device.
> >
> > The last ethdev freeing (dev_private and final release), which were done
> > by rte_eth_dev_detach(), are now done at the end of rte_eth_dev_close().
> >
> > If the driver is trying to free the port again, the function
> > rte_eth_dev_release_port() will abort with -ENODEV error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 6 ++++++
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 3 +--
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > index ed83e5954..3062dc711 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -506,6 +506,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_release_port(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> > {
> > if (eth_dev == NULL)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + if (eth_dev->state == RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> >
> > rte_eth_dev_shared_data_prepare();
> >
> > @@ -1441,6 +1443,10 @@ rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id)
> > dev->data->nb_tx_queues = 0;
> > rte_free(dev->data->tx_queues);
> > dev->data->tx_queues = NULL;
> > +
> > + rte_free(dev->data->dev_private);
>
> It is used by, for example, PCI device uninit functions.
> What does guarantee that uninit is done and we can free the private data.
The state of the port is set to UNUSED and the name is NULL.
So nobody should try to use it anymore.
There are already some checks before calling uninit functions.
For instance, in rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove(),
rte_eth_dev_allocated() will return NULL and won't call uninit function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 23:39 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: complete closing to free all resources Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-10 8:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-10 8:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-10 8:54 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-12 14:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-12 15:44 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-28 12:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-09 22:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-09 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 6:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 7:44 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-10-10 7:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 8:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 15:01 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 16:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 18:01 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 11:16 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 12:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 12:55 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 11:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 2:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 6:26 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 8:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 10:30 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-17 11:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 7:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 8:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 7:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 2:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 10:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev port freeing Shreyansh Jain
2018-10-17 11:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 10:40 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 11:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 11:41 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 16:42 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 11:49 ` Wisam Monther
2018-10-18 13:22 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:45 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 10:51 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 11:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] ethdev: fix doxygen comments of shared data fields Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:11 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 1:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 1:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 1:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 8:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 9:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] app/testpmd: update port list for multiple removals Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 14:32 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 14:32 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] ethdev: fix doxygen comments of shared data fields Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-22 15:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev port freeing Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7172106.4TAESsr7Yr@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).