From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A468F255 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11so125974529wic.0 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:43:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=xu/2QDR64J65ymFr9v5bzr5mnuMXz6VPKDb0QOPBwb4=; b=UxBjxmckt8buOUns9UJvPQBEfw5JtmJGvvYuw7PQFzX7vA+a5cykn07LesptP9jYgp Z7OgH2J5XPAXtOGAGSB+0DGzWCkEdt5LocFYtevWv3uZTtQZfg46FZfRrqACJKHHdRc3 ZqCbnBQlmxUN6HkijxZ9F5h5xjQvT5W4zNyBy8TUvrbgYw46VZhlQt4Uw7bO51jxPFuX UDskY8/LE3wm0dq3lSbL9mD9p3v6SOzx5Tafc2UiCzVueOEMz4mpaXGjBXMGziwm14kQ ORoVnppvZVro9Iee6xmjnkvnQ7M9Q7zc6k9uJVuDwafm7WAPDPFiqAJPICqdtGvTNJUH nYzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2GfcgY2kZbd6Kh2dFme86Ft7byT3LVSUHBQLbm/XeSLAXCkXGRvMaMH3c8iB38HwCVTUG X-Received: by 10.180.87.99 with SMTP id w3mr30837866wiz.4.1438591381420; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hd6sm12372402wib.19.2015.08.03.01.42.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:43:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Chao Zhu Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: <7256638.4inC2JWGiy@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1436783185-8279-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <55BED47A.8030001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55BEE3EA.90006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix ABI breakage in lro code X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:43:01 -0000 Chao, The original need was to check with the ABI checker tool that the ABI was not broken on POWER BE by this patch. 2015-08-03 11:45, Chao Zhu: > Confirmed. It can compile on Power8 Big Endian. > Thank you! > > On 2015/8/3 10:39, Chao Zhu wrote: > > > > Really sorry for the delay. > > Originally, I thought the email was to asking the ABI checking tools > > on Power which I'm not so familiar with. So this took me some time to > > find solution. For Power little endian, the build is OK. I'll give > > feedback when I tried Big endian compilation. [...] > >>>>>> I presume the ABI checker stopped complaining about this with the > >>>>>> patch, yes? > >>>>> Hi Neil, > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I replied about that in the previous thread. > >>>>> > >>>> Thank you, I'll ack as soon as Chao confirms its not a problem on > >>>> ppc Neil