From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C98559C for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:31:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so69290133wmw.0 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 02:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=GsRvQS/+BeR1FTacVBlo+sbUyaexVD2TlZSWjVm5qH8=; b=vAqkpmdxpbHoKC2b/D4/O+oBAYCV48QAlATJ8on6qq3sw5UDKuB1ZaNiDv6nPhG0Pk vxjRzGSL6XGoZUnHcl7IJXVQ583lCEn0Q2DSnlw7XQdD0CL42FJMN49gCkibFklpBsWQ mVhThu6HjwxqjRVyG0eZTZDmNnSMN1qEKB667tnIVPoTasYCtE3AFEtzvsqlVPglb6Ig G+Txl3YSup7fYPOItX6M1C7xBik743ZOCc8T2vXx2skLzUaoX1i180JefmoImezsIokZ Q8Sr4DsJ5Fw/EwbeGTiQY/P+iweGoMUBFDNuVmVIm9E4i7RMTXguB4gDiwzfN0244FAT b9tA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=GsRvQS/+BeR1FTacVBlo+sbUyaexVD2TlZSWjVm5qH8=; b=lc0whtwgwjYX/Xn7e77eDPlk8dNbzNxa0a8qaVLgi7nJjoJJqplyavE65IfXPg+RCU eaTrKzA7GuWTYeYfZe8j/EAZ/mMmdDlkKlQww7vQa4YGd6RYFE5QSy5LEq3EQ0k4Cr9Y Xev7ySlRp3MQR1WpdQjWXj6tItxzSRix547ZY8LD7UMo0CAmIe0MdKXwdnyY9QlmSo7N WSxfjbUBIenJfWRI/fUQLskBehvmXAlztNfroEkwEX3TAoaiNj2cW9zs/Jvm2vRR5r3/ iRWm/aon0xOF3CAMythjiuadnB4CCQAYYOeBfeZlF2rZVUL4++DVCxwc28XxN0MmJ4kW IbNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDv3FXYVN8muPirf8LRDs+ppY18AuCrJO+SYhiczMRbcMhXhUZUNkSqphyoQd9ZrKyrdQo X-Received: by 10.194.58.44 with SMTP id n12mr3088628wjq.118.1447151501447; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 02:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kd8sm2730270wjc.27.2015.11.10.02.31.40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 02:31:40 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Hunt, David" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:30:30 +0100 Message-ID: <7285692.g8AiFBK0OF@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5641C561.6020107@intel.com> References: <5640CB56.4080506@intel.com> <20151109184634.3c3fc809@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> <5641C561.6020107@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK ArmV7 autotests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:31:41 -0000 2015-11-10 10:22, Hunt, David: > On 09/11/2015 17:46, Jan Viktorin wrote: > > Here is the log. You an see, that many tests fail just because > > of the missing hugetlb support. This is strange as I modified the > > autotest_runner.py to inject "--no-huge --no-pci" options when it > > detects armv7 architecture. > > I think publishing these test results to the mailing list confuses > matters somewhat. The tests are not tuned for armv7, and there are many > false negatives, giving the impression that the results are worse than > they actually should be. > > The tests need to be analysed to see if they respect the --no-huge and > --no-pci flags correctly, I suspect some tests are being run even though > these flags are enabled. > > I believe enough of the tests pass to allow the initial version of the > patch set to be accepted. We can look at the failing cases later, and > improve the test suite as time goes on. I agree. The unit tests are know to require some refactoring. I suggest to continue ARM integration while checking how to fix the unit tests later. Maybe that Declan has some ideas or plans about the tests.