From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1117EA0562; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:29:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEAA40141; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:29:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D474003E for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 10:29:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620116969; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tGPJKjKKscxgJvdhyG5nC8B99vj85q+NXg4LkCEJufw=; b=TpEPjYuKiPER+DFNOGW+fnT94MpCZJCYJzAagIty5nuBaXEbwuS5uU3Vzu8js97fEpau6I rOPamv06nr+dV0KbOY5mSmePzF+JWL95KdV1LLB4QkL0dKFx4kO79aFh1l9nb4UxlWyaNM yFIAOaByM0VoEkYyZOs7IX8PsUt9/Ew= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-313-EQwInGnKP7eZjhe5pUY4vw-1; Tue, 04 May 2021 04:29:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EQwInGnKP7eZjhe5pUY4vw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F7050217; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.110.22] (unknown [10.36.110.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15FD5D9D0; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:29:17 +0000 (UTC) To: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, fbl@sysclose.org, i.maximets@ovn.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com, ian.stokes@intel.com References: <20210401095243.18211-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20210503164344.27916-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: <740201e3-c4e9-ad66-36fb-21655656e6d2@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:29:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210503164344.27916-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Offload flags fixes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 5/3/21 6:43 PM, David Marchand wrote: > The important part is the last patch on vhost handling of offloading > requests coming from a virtio guest interface. > > The rest are small fixes that I accumulated while reviewing the mbuf > offload flags. > > On this last patch, it has the potential of breaking existing > applications using the vhost library (OVS being impacted). > I did not mark it for backport. > > Changes since v3: > - patch 1 went through the main repo, > - rebased on next-virtio, > > Changes since v2: > - kept behavior untouched (to avoid breaking ABI) and introduced a new > flag to select the new behavior, > > Changes since v1: > - dropped patch on net/tap, > - added missing bits in example/vhost, > - relaxed checks on VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN and VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP, > Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/main. Thanks, Maxime