From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: luyicai <luyicai@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, chas3@att.com, zhangliang@bigo.sg,
chenchanghu@huawei.com, jerry.lilijun@huawei.com,
haifeng.lin@huawei.com, guohongzhi1@huawei.com,
ferruh.yigit@intel.com, matan@mellanox.com, rasland@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/net/bonding: fix bug for lacp negotiation failed
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:07:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7487826.b65qEJXc0Y@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3071696.IbEkSYjo7c@thomas>
Still no review.
Please give your real name in the Signed-off so it can be merged.
24/06/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon:
> Any review please?
>
> 19/05/2020 13:18, luyicai:
> > When two host is connected directly without any devices like switch,
> > and also enable dedicated tx/rx queues on bonding devices slaves,
> > rx_machine_update would recieving partner lacp negotiation packets,
> > which partner's port mac filled with zeros. So in this situation,
> > it would never go rx_machine branch with correct mac!
> > Thus bond mode 4 will negotiation failed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: luyicai <luyicai@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> > index b77a37d..2002ec0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> > @@ -798,7 +798,8 @@
> > RTE_ASSERT(lacp->lacpdu.subtype == SLOW_SUBTYPE_LACP);
> >
> > partner = &lacp->lacpdu.partner;
> > - if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system,
> > + if (rte_is_zero_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system) ||
> > + rte_is_same_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system,
> > &internals->mode4.mac_addr)) {
> > /* This LACP frame is sending to the bonding port
> > * so pass it to rx_machine.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 11:18 luyicai
2020-06-24 10:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-10 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-07-11 1:42 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-19 7:53 luyicai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7487826.b65qEJXc0Y@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=chenchanghu@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=guohongzhi1@huawei.com \
--cc=haifeng.lin@huawei.com \
--cc=jerry.lilijun@huawei.com \
--cc=luyicai@huawei.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
--cc=zhangliang@bigo.sg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).