DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Cc: "longli@linuxonhyperv.com" <longli@linuxonhyperv.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5] net/netvsc: fix number Tx queues > Rx queues
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 01:04:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <750b1694-2356-427d-a688-a190c79a4e5d@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017160239.1fbd09a4@hermes.local>

On 10/18/2024 12:02 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:38:49 +0000
> Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Subject: Re: [Patch v5] net/netvsc: fix number Tx queues > Rx queues
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:20:29 -0700
>>> longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
>>>   
>>>> +static void
>>>> +hn_rx_queue_free_common(struct hn_rx_queue *rxq) {
>>>> +	if (!rxq)
>>>> +		return;
>>>> +
>>>> +	rte_free(rxq->rxbuf_info);
>>>> +	rte_free(rxq->event_buf);
>>>> +	rte_free(rxq);
>>>> +}  
>>>
>>> Minor nit, DPDK style is for the bracket on the next line.
>>> Checkpatch will complain about this.  
>>
>> Is it okay to take the patch as is, or should I send a v6 to have it fixed?
> 
> It is ok as is, but followup to fix the minor stuff like this would be good.
>

I will fix this one while merging.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-18  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-17 19:20 longli
2024-10-17 22:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 22:38   ` Long Li
2024-10-17 23:02     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-18  0:04       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2024-10-17 23:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-18  0:05 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=750b1694-2356-427d-a688-a190c79a4e5d@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=longli@linuxonhyperv.com \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).