From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 04:35:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7647125.8C0XxgkuRT@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525913806-41723-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com>
Hi,
I am checking if this patch comply with goals discussed in the survey:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/094459.html
- Allow "forgetting" port offloads in queue offloads setup.
- An offload enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level.
- Every queue capabilities must be reported as port capabilities.
- A capability should be reported at queue level
only if it can be enabled on queue when it is disabled on port level.
I think some items must be updated in doxygen comments of rte_ethdev.h.
Please could you try to do a v11 for doxygen? I will review it quickly.
Examples:
- in queue offloads:
"No need to repeat flags already enabled at port level.
A flag enabled at port level, cannot be disabled at queue level."
- in port capabilities: "(include per-queue capabilities)"
More comments below, thanks.
10/05/2018 02:56, Wei Dai:
> This patch check if a input requested offloading is valid or not.
> Any reuqested offloading must be supported in the device capabilities.
> Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set in the parameter
> dev_conf->[rt]xmode.offloads to rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and
> [rt]x_conf->offloads to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> If any offloading is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) by application,
> it is enabled on all queues no matter whether it is per-queue or
> per-port type and no matter whether it is set or cleared in
> [rt]x_conf->offloads to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> If a per-queue offloading hasn't be enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ),
> it can be enabled or disabled for individual queue in
> ret_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> A new added offloading is the one which hasn't been enabled in
> rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and is reuqested to be enabled in
> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ), it must be per-queue type,
> otherwise triger an error log.
> The underlying PMD must be aware that the requested offloadings
> to PMD specific queue_setup( ) function only carries those
> new added offloadings of per-queue type.
Good summary.
Please forget the whitespace inside the parens.
> This patch can make above such checking in a common way in rte_ethdev
> layer to avoid same checking in underlying PMD.
Good
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst
> @@ -297,16 +297,30 @@ Per-Port and Per-Queue Offloads
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> In the DPDK offload API, offloads are divided into per-port and per-queue offloads.
> +A per-queue offloading can be enabled on a queue and disabled on another queue at the same time.
> +A pure per-port offloading can't be enabled on a queue and disabled on another queue at the same time.
> +A pure per-port offloading must be enabled or disabled on all queues at the same time.
> +A per-port offloading can be enabled or disabled on all queues at the same time.
What is the difference between pure per-port and per-port here?
> +It is certain that both per-queue and pure per-port offloading are per-port type.
I don't understand this sentence.
> The different offloads capabilities can be queried using ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()``.
> +The dev_info->[rt]x_queue_offload_capa returned from ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-queue offloading capabilities.
> +The dev_info->[rt]x_offload_capa returned from ``rte_eth_dev_info_get()`` includes all per-port and per-queue offloading capabilities.
Yes
> +Any requested offloading by application must be within the device capabilities.
Yes
> +Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set in the parameter
Yes
> +dev_conf->[rt]xmode.offloads to ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` and
> +[rt]x_conf->offloads to ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``.
> +If any offloading is enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` by application,
> +it is enabled on all queues no matter whether it is per-queue or
> +per-port type and no matter whether it is set or cleared in
> +[rt]x_conf->offloads to ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``.
> +If a per-queue offloading hasn't been enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )``,
> +it can be enabled or disabled in ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )`` for individual queue.
Yes
> +A new added offloads in [rt]x_conf->offloads to ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )`` input by application
> +is the one which hasn't been enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` and is requested to be enabled
> +in ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``, it must be per-queue type, otherwise return error.
Yes
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_05.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_05.rst
> +* **ethdev: changes to offload API**
No need of bold formatting of title in API changes.
> +
> + A pure per-port offloading isn't requested to be repeated in [rt]x_conf->offloads to
> + ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``. Now any offloading enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )``
> + can't be disabled by ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )``. Any new added offloading which has
> + not been enabled in ``rte_eth_dev_configure( )`` and is requested to be enabled in
> + ``rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( )`` must be per-queue type, otherwise return error.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-10 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 13:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check consistency of per port offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-28 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-13 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-15 10:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-16 3:06 ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-25 11:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:49 ` Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 17:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 7:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 8:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 8:51 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 14:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-26 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Wei Dai
2018-04-26 15:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 15:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 15:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-03 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 11:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 14:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-05 18:59 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-07 7:15 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 10:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Wei Dai
2018-05-08 10:41 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 11:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 12:34 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 12:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 0:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API Wei Dai
2018-05-10 0:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 1:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 2:35 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-05-10 11:27 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 9:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-10 19:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 11:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 11:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 21:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 8:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:19 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 21:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 12:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 12:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 13:26 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-14 13:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 14:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 14:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-05-08 17:51 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-09 2:10 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-09 14:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 22:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7647125.8C0XxgkuRT@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=wei.dai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).