DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>,
	orika@nvidia.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
	andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jiaweiw@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 1/1] net: extend VXLAN header to support more extensions
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 23:54:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76ab3ffb-5f6b-4f16-a3a8-4e80f5afffcb@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130112520.1971315-2-gavinl@nvidia.com>

On 1/30/2024 11:25 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
> Currently, DPDK supports VXLAN and VXLAN-GPE with similar header
> structures and we are working on adding support for VXLAN-GBP which is
> another extension to VXLAN. More extension of VXLAN may be added in the
> future.
> 
> VXLAN and VXLAN-GBP use the same UDP port(4789) while VXLAN-GPE uses a
> different one, 4790. The three protocols have the same header length and
> overall similar header structure as below.
>     0                   1                   2                   3
>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |R|R|R|R|I|R|R|R|            Reserved                           |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |                VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI) |   Reserved    |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>                            Figure 1: VXLAN Header
> 
>     0                   1                   2                   3
>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |R|R|Ver|I|P|B|O|       Reserved                |Next Protocol  |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |                VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI) |   Reserved    |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>                          Figure 2: VXLAN-GPE Header
> 
>     0                   1                   2                   3
>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |G|R|R|R|I|R|R|R|R|D|R|R|A|R|R|R|        Group Policy ID        |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |          VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI)       |   Reserved    |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>                           Figure 3: VXLAN-GBP Extension
> 
> Both VXLAN-GPE and VXLAN-GBP extended VXLAN by redefining its reserved
> bits, which means the packets can be processed with same pattern and most
> of the code can be reused. Instead of adding more new items by
> copying/pasting code for the VXLAN extensions in the future, it’s better
> to use existing VXLAN infrastructure and add support code in it.
> 

Hi Gavin,

The motivation is to prevent code duplication, and the code mentioned is
 the driver code, right?

Overall OK to unify "struct rte_vxlan_hdr" although it makes the struct
a little complex, perhaps we can consider extraction some nested structs
as named struct, no strong opinion.


But not sure about removing the flow item types for VXLAN-GPE, or not
adding for VXLAN-GBP.

Think about a case user adding a rule, which has a item type as VXLAN
and in the protocol header some bits are set, lets say first word, last
byte is set, how driver will know if to take it as GPE "next protocol"
or "group policy id".

And if a specific HW detects VXLAN-GPE and VXLAN-GBP protocols as two
separate protocols, won't only having capability to describe VXLAN
protocol in SW be a limitation.

If the target is to remove code duplication in the driver, can it be
accomplished by extracting code that parse the common fields of these
protocols?


> In this patch, all the VXLAN extension header will be merged with VXLAN as
> union if the overlapped field has different format among protocols. The
> existing VXLAN-GPE will be marked as deprecated and new extensions of
> VXLAN should be added to VXLAN instead of a new RTE item.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst |  5 +++
>  lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h                | 13 +++++-
>  lib/net/rte_vxlan.h                  | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 81b93515cb..f9cf931b77 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ Deprecation Notices
>    - ``rte_flow_item_pppoe``
>    - ``rte_flow_item_pppoe_proto_id``
>  
> +* ethdev: The flow item ``RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE`` is replaced with ``RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN``.
> +  The item ``RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE``, the struct ``rte_flow_item_vxlan_gpe``, its mask ``rte_flow_item_vxlan_gpe_mask``,
> +  and the header struct ``rte_vxlan_gpe_hdr`` with the macro ``RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_GPE_HLEN``
> +  will be removed in DPDK 25.11.
> +
>

We have 24.11 in between.


>  * ethdev: Queue specific stats fields will be removed from ``struct rte_eth_stats``.
>    Mentioned fields are: ``q_ipackets``, ``q_opackets``, ``q_ibytes``, ``q_obytes``,
>    ``q_errors``.
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index 1267c146e5..a9943106d9 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ enum rte_flow_item_type {
>  	RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GENEVE,
>  
>  	/**
> +	 * @deprecated Replaced with ``RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN``.
>  	 * Matches a VXLAN-GPE header.
>  	 *
>  	 * See struct rte_flow_item_vxlan_gpe.
> @@ -1096,7 +1097,11 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_sctp rte_flow_item_sctp_mask = {
>  /**
>   * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN.
>   *
> - * Matches a VXLAN header (RFC 7348).
> + * Matches a VXLAN header (RFC 7348), including GPE (draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-13.txt)
> + * and GBP (draft-smith-vxlan-group-policy-05.txt).
> + *
> + * GPE is distinguished with its UDP port.
> + * UDP port may be specified with ``rte_eth_dev_udp_tunnel_port_add()``.
>   */
>  struct rte_flow_item_vxlan {
>  	union {
> @@ -1339,6 +1344,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_geneve rte_flow_item_geneve_mask = {
>  #endif
>  
>  /**
> + * @deprecated Replaced with ``rte_flow_item_vxlan``.
>   * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE (draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-05).
>   *
>   * Matches a VXLAN-GPE header.
> @@ -1360,7 +1366,10 @@ struct rte_flow_item_vxlan_gpe {
>  	};
>  };
>  
> -/** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE. */
> +/**
> + * @deprecated Replaced with ``rte_flow_item_vxlan_mask``.
> + * Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE.
> + */
>  #ifndef __cplusplus
>  static const struct rte_flow_item_vxlan_gpe rte_flow_item_vxlan_gpe_mask = {
>  	.hdr.vni = "\xff\xff\xff",
> diff --git a/lib/net/rte_vxlan.h b/lib/net/rte_vxlan.h
> index 997fc784fc..255c30f71d 100644
> --- a/lib/net/rte_vxlan.h
> +++ b/lib/net/rte_vxlan.h
> @@ -38,8 +38,65 @@ struct rte_vxlan_hdr {
>  			rte_be32_t vx_vni;   /**< VNI (24) + Reserved (8). */
>  		};
>  		struct {
> -			uint8_t    flags;    /**< Should be 8 (I flag). */
> -			uint8_t    rsvd0[3]; /**< Reserved. */
> +			union {
> +				uint8_t    flags;    /**< Should be 8 (I flag). */
> +				/* Flag bits defined by GPE */
> +				struct {
> +#if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> +					uint8_t flag_o:1,
> +						flag_b:1,
> +						flag_p:1,
> +						flag_i_gpe:1,
> +						flag_ver:2,
> +						rsvd_gpe:2;
> +#elif RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN
> +					uint8_t rsvd_gpe:2,
> +						flag_ver:2,
> +						flag_i_gpe:1,
> +						flag_p:1,
> +						flag_b:1,
> +						flag_o:1;
> +#endif
> +				};
> +				/* Flag bits defined by GBP */
> +				struct {
> +#if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> +					uint8_t rsvd_gbp1:3,
> +						flag_i_gbp:1,
> +						rsvd_gbp2:3,
> +						flag_g:1;
> +#elif RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN
> +					uint8_t flag_g:1,
> +						rsvd_gbp1:3,
> +						flag_i_gbp:1,
> +						rsvd_gbp2:3;
> +#endif
> +				};
> +			};
> +			union {
> +				uint8_t    rsvd0[3]; /**< Reserved. */
> +				/* Overlap with rte_vxlan_gpe_hdr which is deprecated.*/
> +				struct {
> +					uint8_t rsvd0_gpe[2]; /**< Reserved. */
> +					uint8_t proto;	   /**< Next protocol. */
> +				};
> +				struct {
> +#if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> +					uint8_t rsvd0_gbp1:3,
> +						policy_applied:1,
> +						rsvd0_gbp2:2,
> +						dont_learn:1,
> +						rsvd0_gbp3:1;
> +#elif RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_BIG_ENDIAN
> +					uint8_t rsvd0_gbp1:1,
> +						dont_learn:1,
> +						rsvd0_gbp2:2,
> +						policy_applied:1,
> +						rsvd0_gbp3:3;
> +#endif
> +					uint16_t policy_id;
> +				};
> +			};
>  			uint8_t    vni[3];   /**< VXLAN identifier. */
>  			uint8_t    rsvd1;    /**< Reserved. */
>  		};
> @@ -52,6 +109,7 @@ struct rte_vxlan_hdr {
>  
>  
>  /**
> + * @deprecated Replaced with ``rte_vxlan_hdr``.
>   * VXLAN-GPE protocol header (draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-05).
>   * Contains the 8-bit flag, 8-bit next-protocol, 24-bit VXLAN Network
>   * Identifier and Reserved fields (16 bits and 8 bits).
> @@ -75,7 +133,10 @@ struct rte_vxlan_gpe_hdr {
>  	};
>  } __rte_packed;
>  
> -/** VXLAN-GPE tunnel header length. */
> +/**
> + * @deprecated Replaced with ``RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_HLEN``.
> + * VXLAN-GPE tunnel header length.
> + */
>  #define RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_GPE_HLEN (sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr) + \
>  		sizeof(struct rte_vxlan_gpe_hdr))
>  


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 11:25 [RFC V1 0/1] " Gavin Li
2024-01-30 11:25 ` [RFC V1 1/1] " Gavin Li
2024-02-06 22:51   ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-07  4:49     ` Ajit Khaparde
2024-02-08 23:54   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2024-02-09 10:12     ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-09 12:11       ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-09 13:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-09 14:58           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-09 15:32             ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-09 15:58               ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-19  3:16               ` Gavin Li
2024-02-19  3:44               ` Gavin Li
2024-02-19  4:03                 ` Gavin Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76ab3ffb-5f6b-4f16-a3a8-4e80f5afffcb@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gavinl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiaweiw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).