From: Martin Weiser <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com>
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, xiaolong.ye@intel.com,
taox.zhu@intel.com, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] net/ixgbe: ixgbe_dev_link_update_share() leaks memory and memory mappings due to not cleaning up pthreads
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:33:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76e82b41-3a76-6c6e-bb47-1f9e0809a153@allegro-packets.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25ebe98d-071e-a80a-fa87-42385f4cd72b@allegro-packets.com>
Sorry, please ignore my previous statement about this having been
reworked in master. I was comparing to the wrong checkout.
This issue seems to be still present in the current master.
Am 09.04.20 um 14:06 schrieb Martin Weiser:
> Hi,
>
> I should have mentioned that our findings apply to DPDK 20.02. I can see
> in master that this since has been reworked to use rte_eal_alarm_set()
> instead of using a thread.
> But maybe this should be addressed in stable?
>
> Best regards,
> Martin Weiser
>
>
> Am 09.04.20 um 12:30 schrieb Martin Weiser:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we recently discovered that our application was not able to create new
>> threads or perform mmaps after some time.
>> With some digging we identified the function
>> ixgbe_dev_link_update_share() to be the reason for this behavior.
>>
>> In the patch "net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events"
>> (819d0d1d57f17aa40321648e99a50b49adc7bdf6) a thread is introduced to
>> run ixgbe_dev_setup_link_thread_handler().
>> Unfortunately this thread is not detached and just joined (the very
>> last one spawned that is) through ixgbe_dev_cancel_link_thread() upon
>> interface start/stop.
>>
>> When an application repeatedly calls e.g. rte_eth_link_get_nowait() on
>> an ixgbe interface with no link this causes a lot of pthreads never to
>> be cleaned up.
>> Since each thread holds a mmap to the stack this can quite quickly
>> exhaust the allowed number of memory mappings for the process.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Martin Weiser
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-09 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <35d734a2-34c4-3cc8-6e3e-58a17a7bb9da@allegro-packets.com>
2020-04-09 12:06 ` Martin Weiser
2020-04-09 12:33 ` Martin Weiser [this message]
2020-04-09 15:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-09 10:31 Martin Weiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76e82b41-3a76-6c6e-bb47-1f9e0809a153@allegro-packets.com \
--to=martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=taox.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).