DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC V1] examples/l3fwd-power: fix memory leak for rte_pci_device
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:01:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76ee3238-5d1f-70c5-3ec1-92662dea2185@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2757246.qzpMWD9H8a@thomas>

Hi, Thomas

在 2021/9/7 16:53, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
> 07/09/2021 05:41, Huisong Li:
>> Calling rte_eth_dev_close() will release resources of eth device and close
>> it. But rte_pci_device struct isn't released when app exit, which will lead
>> to memory leak.
> That's a PMD issue.
> When the last port of a PCI device is closed, the device should be freed.

Why is this a PMD problem? I don't understand.

As far as I know, most apps or examples in the DPDK project have only 
one port for a pci device.

When the port is closed, the rte_pci_device should be freed. But none of 
the apps seem to do this.

>
>> +		/* Retrieve device address in eth device before closing it. */
>> +		eth_dev = &rte_eth_devices[portid];
> You should not access this array, considered internal.

We have to save the address of rte_device to free rte_pci_device before 
closing eth device.

Because the the device address in rte_eth_dev struct will be set to a 
NULL after closing eth device.

It's also handled in OVS in this way.

>
>> +		rte_dev = eth_dev->device;
>>   		rte_eth_dev_close(portid);
>> +		ret = rte_dev_remove(rte_dev);
>
>
> .

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-08  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07  3:41 Huisong Li
2021-09-07  8:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-08  2:01   ` Huisong Li [this message]
2021-09-08  7:20     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-16  8:01       ` Huisong Li
2021-09-16 10:36         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-17  2:13           ` Huisong Li
2021-09-17 12:50             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-18  3:24               ` Huisong Li
2021-09-18  8:46                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-26 12:20                   ` Huisong Li
2021-09-26 19:16                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-27  1:44                       ` Huisong Li
2021-09-30  6:28                         ` Huisong Li
2021-09-30  7:50                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-08  6:26                             ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-08  6:29                               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76ee3238-5d1f-70c5-3ec1-92662dea2185@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).