From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A73A04B1; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:57:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E2B1C1B1; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625B81C1AC; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:57:29 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: Gb8tD2JdaZrIiyZVaeTcix5dcqdaD2FFKB+ajMPBL54NlzSDXqCXldoiKXB7NiLWcGjWXge5JC chnGKRFASCcg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9725"; a="154019853" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,359,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="154019853" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2020 03:57:28 -0700 IronPort-SDR: Kmd0/j7o5LMfVMbKvH+HFr5USIz5CXYlqTOalRYq+cMlCB5hsCygQCh0WO9x/7D5es+OC/2AZl apZrMWMpUcMg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,359,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="337134176" Received: from aburakov-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.242.200]) ([10.213.242.200]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2020 03:57:27 -0700 To: Luca Boccassi Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" , "Chen, BoX C" References: <20200818181222.8462-1-bluca@debian.org> <5e4efca917b88a9f6983229369547a1f410a110b.camel@debian.org> <45bd96a0-b8d6-ea77-68ea-1a2d6f016051@intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <7701fd6c-6e1b-6834-12ac-35b9fd612625@intel.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:57:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.4 patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 27-Aug-20 11:37 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:47 +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: >> On 26-Aug-20 10:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: >>> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 02:30 +0000, Chen, BoX C wrote: >>>> Hi Luca, >>>> Update LTS 19.11.4 test result for Intel part. No new issue is found except known issues. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>>> * Intel(R) Testing >>>> >>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >>>> * PF(i40e):Passed >>>> - Exception message when starting testpmd for testing external memory. It has been fixed on 20.05.patch link: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/66041/ >>> >>> Anatoly, is it safe to backport this patch to 19.11? It applies and >>> builds cleanly when cherry-picked: >>> >>> d1c7c0cdf7ba ("vfio: map contiguous areas in one go") >> >> Hi Luca, >> >> Yes, it should be safe - at least i'm not aware of any breakages ever >> being reported so far. Thanks! > > Could you please double-check that there's no other patch/change that > depends on it/that it depends on and is missing from 19.11.4-rc1? Given > we wouldn't redo the full regression run, we need to be careful > I'm positive that it's self-contained. It's just a different way of iterating through an array :) -- Thanks, Anatoly