From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] devtools: check flow API doc tables
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:51:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <778def48-a0db-8353-dd5c-1d254a778230@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210407223320.2952469-4-thomas@monjalon.net>
On 4/7/2021 11:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The script check-doc-vs-code.sh may be used to add
> some automatic checks of the doc.
>
> If run without any argument, a complete check is done.
> The optional argument is a git history reference point
> to check faster only what has changed since this commit.
>
> In this commit, the only check is for rte_flow tables,
> achieved through the script parse-flow-support.sh.
> If run without a .ini reference, it prints rte_flow tables.
> Note: detected features are marked with the value Y,
> while the real .ini file could have special values like I.
> The script allow parsing exceptions (exclude or include),
> like for bnxt code which lists unsupported items and actions.
>
Overall great to be able to generate and check document against code, also good
to have this by relatively small/simple scripts, thanks for the work.
This helps to remove the maintenance concerns I had.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> ---
> devtools/check-doc-vs-code.sh | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> devtools/parse-flow-support.sh | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Will there be automated checks as part of the build system? Presumably in
'developer_mode'?
btw, scripts points out some new features not documented in .ini files, those
are the recently added ones, patch requires a rebase on top of latest code.
> +rte_flow_support() # <category>
> +{
> + title="rte_flow $1s"
> + pattern=$(echo "RTE_FLOW_$1_TYPE_" | awk '{print toupper($0)}')
> + list "$title" "$pattern" | grep -vwE 'void|end'
Should 'RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ANY' also excluded, does it have benefit to have it
as listed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 17:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add new tables for rte flow items and actions support Asaf Penso
2021-02-04 22:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-07 8:46 ` Asaf Penso
2021-02-07 9:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-07 9:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Asaf Penso
2021-02-07 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Asaf Penso
2021-02-07 10:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Asaf Penso
2021-02-08 12:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-16 13:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-17 5:57 ` Asaf Penso
2021-02-17 10:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-17 10:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-02-18 16:12 ` Asaf Penso
2021-02-18 17:58 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-02-18 18:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-06 15:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-07 22:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] rte_flow doc matrix Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-07 22:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] doc: rename sfc features file Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-07 22:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] doc: add flow API features tables Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-08 8:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
2021-05-14 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-14 11:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-07 22:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] devtools: check flow API doc tables Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-13 18:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-18 12:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-14 10:51 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-05-18 10:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-18 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] rte_flow doc matrix Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-18 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] doc: rename sfc features file Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-18 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] doc: add flow API features tables Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-18 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] devtools: check flow API doc tables Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-18 16:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] rte_flow doc matrix Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=778def48-a0db-8353-dd5c-1d254a778230@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).