From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, lucp.at.work@gmail.com,
david.marchand@redhat.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: abstract the behaviour of rte_ctrl_thread_create
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 16:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7793415.AuWXLK4XGA@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730214453.19975-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
30/07/2021 23:44, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> The current expected behaviour of the function rte_ctrl_thread_create
> is rigid which makes the implementation of the function complex.
> Make the expected behaviour abstract to allow for simplified
> implementation.
>
> With this change, the calls to pthread_setaffinity_np can be moved
> to the control thread. This will avoid the use of
> pthread_barrier_wait and simplify the synchronization mechanism
> between rte_ctrl_thread_create and the calling thread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
> +* eal: The expected behaviour of the function ``rte_ctrl_thread_create``
> + abstracted to allow for simplified implementation. The new behaviour is
> + as follows:
> + Creates a control thread with the given name. The affinity of the new
> + thread is based on the CPU affinity retrieved at the time rte_eal_init()
> + was called, the dataplane and service lcores are then excluded.
I don't understand what is different of the current API:
* Wrapper to pthread_create(), pthread_setname_np() and
* pthread_setaffinity_np(). The affinity of the new thread is based
* on the CPU affinity retrieved at the time rte_eal_init() was called,
* the dataplane and service lcores are then excluded.
Anyway, there is not enough meaningful acks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-07 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 21:44 Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-03 5:54 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-08-03 7:25 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-08-03 15:49 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-07 14:55 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-08-09 13:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-23 9:40 ` Olivier Matz
2021-08-23 21:18 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7793415.AuWXLK4XGA@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=lucp.at.work@gmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).