From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1065628F3 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:55:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t189so19678009wmt.1 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:55:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iM2bajPnzDz3+ZOvxh+DTSto/z69JTSVAv7SqCusze4=; b=fyPEGBPqbzhVyYpRqC+vaghOGCHQhpI5ky/frukMiZI3KGlZFoshE64ejAQrFZEz6E PVNh8p7IOQjXX5FE3ojbk4gnQLo0w1uD+Qr0xxqts6nKNg4CluqHIAnHUYWMdwm51X74 k36nk8xW85FRJJ7QjsUb/psNXGWyuAfYKOPH+9RIYGdqPUhq+Nk7Fkrd7TZnWi6RPCLc tpXYL2S1Y32qsDvVYL9iO6VKpn1fxWeAw2HqMGQOypGZkJHm0uqWiqd22E8Fr/iD4CHq Wctntdqkvd4+LFLAxCCuuKffSd2Q2OBXnsYXw8zvtfvH9Dif1AjbGkuvMRGM3iRSBPBi d8fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iM2bajPnzDz3+ZOvxh+DTSto/z69JTSVAv7SqCusze4=; b=MzMZ0PZ1f+NmTLBM/ORriruTn/GAsYsVjrPZK9Nvax+mXUQ9wLdWwWun9KY5luZT4N BUwsCbKVTnKABXJPYZypTVOaXSzryJqJJbtZOGKyotTBdK+Ig7Uh9xxifV4ufVSAjFHZ 3mJ3DkRB3XUh5X89/vBT55dpTBoge98i0AkkN3iNV5vOmcJqr1l7FMrHORD2nrdRk75h nz31eCdmh/S5vGpxGZg/hQV9pLwLlVzlchzdb1Jc0C7AIpYW2TRr2zWG2+Dv4UYoL8/6 Hknh3WPU06iBR0yLjjNQBUPioXIm38Yfm189bhVsYMFk1S9c/pHLVtiuZ7z92ydnlX16 RCuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3r+xrJzvAsJTdYnY/rNKBIPR2npKvm3HW7SSIeyRDKHSL9ksniaBoXRg2GKNwcSBCQ X-Received: by 10.28.95.87 with SMTP id t84mr18653666wmb.35.1489575336850; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v18sm1864521wrc.41.2017.03.15.03.55.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 03:55:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com> Cc: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>, "Legacy, Allain (Wind River)" <allain.legacy@windriver.com>, "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org, "Jolliffe, Ian (Wind River)" <ian.jolliffe@windriver.com>, "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>, techboard@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:55:35 +0100 Message-ID: <78399437.9zD9LecKHj@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA7231E927@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1488414008-162839-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com> <4b3a0ff4-3d19-8e4b-0cbf-2a08e6433285@6wind.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA7231E927@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] Wind River Systems AVP PMD vs virtio? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:55:37 -0000 2017-03-15 04:10, O'Driscoll, Tim: > I've included a couple of specific comments inline below, and a general comment here. > > We have somebody proposing to add a new driver to DPDK. It's standalone and doesn't affect any of the core libraries. They're willing to maintain the driver and have included a patch to update the maintainers file. They've also included the relevant documentation changes. I haven't seen any negative comment on the patches themselves except for a request from John McNamara for an update to the Release Notes that was addressed in a later version. I think we should be welcoming this into DPDK rather than questioning/rejecting it. > > I'd suggest that this is a good topic for the next Tech Board meeting. I agree Tim. CC'ing techboard to add this item to the agenda of the next meeting.