From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: reduce memory consumption
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:14:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <785dc5f5-8378-3506-aaa8-39ec22a3eb11@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29706985.E09nPtnjEF@xps>
On 11/22/2019 1:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/11/2019 13:24, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 11/22/2019 10:43 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> diff --git a/devtools/test-null.sh b/devtools/test-null.sh
>>> index 9f9a459f76..6e5b1ad529 100755
>>> --- a/devtools/test-null.sh
>>> +++ b/devtools/test-null.sh
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ else
>>> fi
>>>
>>> (sleep 1 && echo stop) |
>>> -$testpmd -c $coremask --no-huge -m 150 \
>>> +$testpmd -c $coremask --no-huge -m 20 \
>>> $libs --vdev net_null1 --vdev net_null2 $eal_options -- \
>>> --no-mlockall --total-num-mbufs=2048 $testpmd_options -ia
>>
>> What do you think to separate this part, and go with first version of the patchset?
>>
>> And I am not sure if we should update at all, what is the benefit?
Fair enough.
>
> The benefit it to test that there is no anormal memory needs.
>
>> Also script fails after update, because of the additional physical devices and
>> their memory requirement, it is possible to make it run with additional testpmd
>> argument but fails by default.
>
> This test is supposed to be for null devices only.
> Why are you trying to add physical devices?
> Oh wait, we miss an option -w 0 to be in whitelist mode?
>
I am not trying to add physical devices, they are already there in my
environment, yes adding "-w" can solve it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-21 15:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " David Marchand
2019-11-21 15:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-21 16:17 ` David Marchand
2019-11-21 16:23 ` David Marchand
2019-11-21 21:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-21 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-11-21 20:32 ` David Marchand
2019-11-21 21:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-21 21:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-22 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2019-11-22 12:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-22 13:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-22 13:14 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-11-22 13:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: disable automatic probing in null testing Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-22 13:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-22 15:56 ` David Marchand
2019-11-24 22:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-22 14:03 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-11-22 14:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-22 14:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: reduce memory consumption Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=785dc5f5-8378-3506-aaa8-39ec22a3eb11@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).