[dpdk-dev] Does the rte_eth_tx_burst() function is multi-threaded safe when sending pkt in same port and same queue ?

[dpdk-dev] Does the rte_eth_tx_burst() function is multi-threaded safe when sending pkt in same port and same queue ?

[chen_lp]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) 
is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of 
Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is 
not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,  storing, disclosure or copying 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please 
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from 
your system. Thank you. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [dpdk-dev] Does the rte_eth_tx_burst() function is multi-threaded safe when sending pkt in same port and same queue ?

[Stephen Hemminger]

The rx and tx functions are safe only if a queue is not shared by
multiple threads (or the threads synchronize through some other
mechanism). The safest design is to only use a queue on a single core.
You will see different architectures in the examples. Some use one
queue per core, and others use separate receive and transmit cores.

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:16 PM, chen_lp <chen_lp@neusoft.com> wrote:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s)
> is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of
> Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is
> not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,  storing, disclosure or copying
> is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please
> immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from
> your system. Thank you.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [dpdk-dev] Does the rte_eth_tx_burst() function is multi-threaded safe when sending pkt in same port and same queue ?

[金健]

But when I read the code of  l2fwd (v1.5.1 examples), I found that two cores share only one queue of a port.

And it doesn't use any lock or other mechanism to ensure the safety.

How is it OK?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "chen_lp" <chen_lp@neusoft.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Does the rte_eth_tx_burst() function is multi-threaded safe when sending pkt in same port and same queue ?


> The rx and tx functions are safe only if a queue is not shared by
> multiple threads (or the threads synchronize through some other
> mechanism). The safest design is to only use a queue on a single core.
> You will see different architectures in the examples. Some use one
> queue per core, and others use separate receive and transmit cores.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:16 PM, chen_lp <chen_lp@neusoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s)
>> is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of
>> Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is
>> not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,  storing, disclosure or copying
>> is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please
>> immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from
>> your system. Thank you.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) 
is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of 
Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is 
not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,  storing, disclosure or copying 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please 
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from 
your system. Thank you. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------