From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B464358DD
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 16:53:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l18so9738252wgh.35
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=UbUSUtFDVSJ5fUXQmsdPvk5oGjWDmOaMeRJ/TpOkRks=;
 b=JSVgobArdD7tfGKDA0bWVLe1IKfVWVMHGYDuPWP3sxUTzZbA0gAfiJM1vTV6IEW4+G
 qDaPeMn/8HDZYpjw0n3KWTfCpdZp6+ONXLRuahIhnTOFJbtxNvCtOS1/y6oh3IzEZnqX
 wLqRuMsHTSom50HzA1Sj2fVBECw+29s5XG4YsxR4dYs5RoMcWNChVvXwq9c9B+Xs8dhh
 AMZ4Jp5HJKw60czg4D1Of+yTOvZnAslYHwU1J5FWcL1GTiLcHFHo4WkPjpZbXzdLhpR3
 5aloMC8wkOcTkzvbwTq34FGNYetM1tekDvCDocfrSPY1j0/I+AfNPsfgNOE+qGTULJxf
 SUBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkS1AajtOEwmqjxha2aClSNwqoaMwlyYEBCChwTBjjqdKPKmoBnHVuwTmRChP39Dx987sJk
X-Received: by 10.180.228.7 with SMTP id se7mr38218630wic.2.1401202407232;
 Tue, 27 May 2014 07:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m2sm35573310wjw.3.2014.05.27.07.53.25
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 27 May 2014 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:53:22 +0200
Message-ID: <7982092.0LOTupiQtt@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.14.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <536A307C.7050304@6wind.com>
References: <1399386672-10480-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
 <536A307C.7050304@6wind.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] fix for jumbo frame issue with DPDK VF
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:53:17 -0000

> > When latest Linux ixgbe PF is used, and DPDK VF is used in DPDK
> > application, jumbo frames are not received.
> > Also - if Linux ixgbe PF has MTU set to 1500 (default),
> > then normal sized packets can be received by DPDK VF.
> > However, if Linux PF has MTU > 1500, then DPDK VF receives no packets
> > (normal or jumbo).
> > With ixgbe_mbox_api_10 ixgbe simply didn't allow set VF MTU > 1514 for
> > 82599. With ixgbe_mbox_ajpi_11 it does, though now, if PF uses jumbo
> > frames, it simply disables RX for all VFs.
> > So to work with PF ithat using jumbo frames, at startup each VF has to:
> > 1. negotiate with PF mbox_api_11.
> > 2. Send to PF SET_LPE message with desired MTU.
> > Note, that if PF already uses MTU bigger then asked by the VF,
> > then PF wouldn't take any action.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Ivan Boule <ivan.boule@6wind.com>

Applied for version 1.7.0.

Thanks
-- 
Thomas