DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Malov <Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru>
To: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Andy Moreton <amoreton@xilinx.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] common/sfc_efx/base: add MAE VLAN presence match bits
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:09:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79ed0113-5574-55b9-2e7c-df77558c4cef@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff74fd24-c7a7-bea9-cdf1-d1ca69558103@ashroe.eu>

Hi,

On 28/04/2021 13:08, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28/04/2021 10:49, Ivan Malov wrote:
>> Introduce necessary infrastructure for these fields to
>> be set, validated and compared during class comparison.
>> Enumeration and mappings envisaged are MCDI-compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amoreton@xilinx.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h      |  18 ++
>>   drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h |   3 +-
>>   drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c  | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/common/sfc_efx/version.map     |   1 +
>>   4 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h
>> index 771fe5a17..8e13075b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h
>> @@ -4103,6 +4103,10 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_fini(
>>   	__in				efx_mae_match_spec_t *spec);
>>   
>>   typedef enum efx_mae_field_id_e {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Fields which can be set by efx_mae_match_spec_field_set()
>> +	 * or by using dedicated field-specific helper APIs.
>> +	 */
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_INGRESS_MPORT_SELECTOR = 0,
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ETHER_TYPE_BE,
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ETH_SADDR_BE,
>> @@ -4140,6 +4144,12 @@ typedef enum efx_mae_field_id_e {
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ENC_VNET_ID_BE,
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_OUTER_RULE_ID,
>>   
>> +	/* Single bits which can be set by efx_mae_match_spec_bit_set(). */
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_HAS_OVLAN,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_HAS_IVLAN,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ENC_HAS_OVLAN,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ENC_HAS_IVLAN,
>> +
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_NIDS
>>   } efx_mae_field_id_t;
>>   
>> @@ -4198,6 +4208,14 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_field_set(
>>   	__in				size_t mask_size,
>>   	__in_bcount(mask_size)		const uint8_t *mask);
>>   
>> +/* The corresponding mask will be set to B_TRUE. */
>> +LIBEFX_API
>> +extern	__checkReturn			efx_rc_t
> 
> Missing rte_internal on the forward declaration?

Not really. It has LIBEFX_API in place. And LIBEFX_API, in turn, is 
defined as __rte_internal in drivers/common/sfc_efx/efsys.h . Thank you.

> 
>> +efx_mae_match_spec_bit_set(
>> +	__in				efx_mae_match_spec_t *spec,
>> +	__in				efx_mae_field_id_t field_id,
>> +	__in				boolean_t value);
>> +
>>   /* If the mask argument is NULL, the API will use full mask by default. */
>>   LIBEFX_API
>>   extern	__checkReturn			efx_rc_t
>> diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h
>> index 4a513171a..8b63cfb37 100644
>> --- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h
>> +++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h
>> @@ -1720,7 +1720,8 @@ struct efx_mae_match_spec_s {
>>   	efx_mae_rule_type_t		emms_type;
>>   	uint32_t			emms_prio;
>>   	union emms_mask_value_pairs {
>> -		uint8_t			action[MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_LEN];
>> +		uint8_t			action[
>> +					    MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_LEN];
>>   		uint8_t			outer[MAE_ENC_FIELD_PAIRS_LEN];
>>   	} emms_mask_value_pairs;
>>   };
>> diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
>> index 80fe155d0..33ba31389 100644
>> --- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
>> +++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
>> @@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ typedef enum efx_mae_field_cap_id_e {
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_ENC_L4_DPORT_BE = MAE_FIELD_ENC_L4_DPORT,
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_ENC_VNET_ID_BE = MAE_FIELD_ENC_VNET_ID,
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_OUTER_RULE_ID = MAE_FIELD_OUTER_RULE_ID,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_HAS_OVLAN = MAE_FIELD_HAS_OVLAN,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_HAS_IVLAN = MAE_FIELD_HAS_IVLAN,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_ENC_HAS_OVLAN = MAE_FIELD_ENC_HAS_OVLAN,
>> +	EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_ENC_HAS_IVLAN = MAE_FIELD_ENC_HAS_IVLAN,
>>   
>>   	EFX_MAE_FIELD_CAP_NIDS
>>   } efx_mae_field_cap_id_t;
>> @@ -577,6 +581,65 @@ static const efx_mae_mv_desc_t __efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_desc_set[] = {
>>   
>>   #undef EFX_MAE_MV_DESC_ALT
>>   #undef EFX_MAE_MV_DESC
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The following structure is a means to describe an MAE bit.
>> + * The information in it is meant to be used internally by
>> + * APIs for addressing a given flag in a mask-value pairs
>> + * structure and for validation purposes.
>> + */
>> +typedef struct efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_s {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Arrays using this struct are indexed by field IDs.
>> +	 * Fields which aren't meant to be referenced by these
>> +	 * arrays comprise gaps (invalid entries). Below field
>> +	 * helps to identify such entries.
>> +	 */
>> +	boolean_t			emmbd_entry_is_valid;
>> +	efx_mae_field_cap_id_t		emmbd_bit_cap_id;
>> +	size_t				emmbd_value_ofst;
>> +	unsigned int			emmbd_value_lbn;
>> +	size_t				emmbd_mask_ofst;
>> +	unsigned int			emmbd_mask_lbn;
>> +} efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t;
>> +
>> +static const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t __efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set[] = {
>> +#define	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(_name)					\
>> +	[EFX_MAE_FIELD_##_name] =					\
>> +	{								\
>> +		B_TRUE,							\
>> +		EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_##_name,				\
>> +		MAE_ENC_FIELD_PAIRS_##_name##_OFST,			\
>> +		MAE_ENC_FIELD_PAIRS_##_name##_LBN,			\
>> +		MAE_ENC_FIELD_PAIRS_##_name##_MASK_OFST,		\
>> +		MAE_ENC_FIELD_PAIRS_##_name##_MASK_LBN,			\
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(ENC_HAS_OVLAN),
>> +	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(ENC_HAS_IVLAN),
>> +
>> +#undef EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t __efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set[] = {
>> +#define	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(_name)					\
>> +	[EFX_MAE_FIELD_##_name] =					\
>> +	{								\
>> +		B_TRUE,							\
>> +		EFX_MAE_FIELD_ID_##_name,				\
>> +		MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_FLAGS_OFST,		\
>> +		MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_##_name##_LBN,		\
>> +		MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_FLAGS_MASK_OFST,		\
>> +		MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_##_name##_LBN,		\
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(HAS_OVLAN),
>> +	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(HAS_IVLAN),
>> +	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(ENC_HAS_OVLAN),
>> +	EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC(ENC_HAS_IVLAN),
>> +
>> +#undef EFX_MAE_MV_BIT_DESC
>>   };
>>   
>>   	__checkReturn			efx_rc_t
>> @@ -775,6 +838,70 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_field_set(
>>   	EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
>>   fail4:
>>   	EFSYS_PROBE(fail4);
>> +fail3:
>> +	EFSYS_PROBE(fail3);
>> +fail2:
>> +	EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
>> +fail1:
>> +	EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, efx_rc_t, rc);
>> +	return (rc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +	__checkReturn			efx_rc_t
>> +efx_mae_match_spec_bit_set(
>> +	__in				efx_mae_match_spec_t *spec,
>> +	__in				efx_mae_field_id_t field_id,
>> +	__in				boolean_t value)
>> +{
>> +	const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t *bit_descp;
>> +	unsigned int bit_desc_set_nentries;
>> +	unsigned int byte_idx;
>> +	unsigned int bit_idx;
>> +	uint8_t *mvp;
>> +	efx_rc_t rc;
>> +
>> +	switch (spec->emms_type) {
>> +	case EFX_MAE_RULE_OUTER:
>> +		bit_desc_set_nentries =
>> +		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set);
>> +		bit_descp = &__efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set[field_id];
>> +		mvp = spec->emms_mask_value_pairs.outer;
>> +		break;
>> +	case EFX_MAE_RULE_ACTION:
>> +		bit_desc_set_nentries =
>> +		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set);
>> +		bit_descp = &__efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set[field_id];
>> +		mvp = spec->emms_mask_value_pairs.action;
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		rc = ENOTSUP;
>> +		goto fail1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if ((unsigned int)field_id >= bit_desc_set_nentries) {
>> +		rc = EINVAL;
>> +		goto fail2;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (bit_descp->emmbd_entry_is_valid == B_FALSE) {
>> +		rc = EINVAL;
>> +		goto fail3;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	byte_idx = bit_descp->emmbd_value_ofst + bit_descp->emmbd_value_lbn / 8;
>> +	bit_idx = bit_descp->emmbd_value_lbn % 8;
>> +
>> +	if (value != B_FALSE)
>> +		mvp[byte_idx] |= (1U << bit_idx);
>> +	else
>> +		mvp[byte_idx] &= ~(1U << bit_idx);
>> +
>> +	byte_idx = bit_descp->emmbd_mask_ofst + bit_descp->emmbd_mask_lbn / 8;
>> +	bit_idx = bit_descp->emmbd_mask_lbn % 8;
>> +	mvp[byte_idx] |= (1U << bit_idx);
>> +
>> +	return (0);
>> +
>>   fail3:
>>   	EFSYS_PROBE(fail3);
>>   fail2:
>> @@ -891,6 +1018,8 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_is_valid(
>>   	const efx_mae_field_cap_t *field_caps;
>>   	const efx_mae_mv_desc_t *desc_setp;
>>   	unsigned int desc_set_nentries;
>> +	const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t *bit_desc_setp;
>> +	unsigned int bit_desc_set_nentries;
>>   	boolean_t is_valid = B_TRUE;
>>   	efx_mae_field_id_t field_id;
>>   	const uint8_t *mvp;
>> @@ -901,6 +1030,9 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_is_valid(
>>   		desc_setp = __efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_desc_set;
>>   		desc_set_nentries =
>>   		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_desc_set);
>> +		bit_desc_setp = __efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set;
>> +		bit_desc_set_nentries =
>> +		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set);
>>   		mvp = spec->emms_mask_value_pairs.outer;
>>   		break;
>>   	case EFX_MAE_RULE_ACTION:
>> @@ -908,6 +1040,9 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_is_valid(
>>   		desc_setp = __efx_mae_action_rule_mv_desc_set;
>>   		desc_set_nentries =
>>   		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_action_rule_mv_desc_set);
>> +		bit_desc_setp = __efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set;
>> +		bit_desc_set_nentries =
>> +		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set);
>>   		mvp = spec->emms_mask_value_pairs.action;
>>   		break;
>>   	default:
>> @@ -975,6 +1110,48 @@ efx_mae_match_spec_is_valid(
>>   			break;
>>   		}
>>   
>> +		if (is_valid == B_FALSE)
>> +			return (B_FALSE);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (field_id = 0; (unsigned int)field_id < bit_desc_set_nentries;
>> +	     ++field_id) {
>> +		const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t *bit_descp =
>> +		    &bit_desc_setp[field_id];
>> +		unsigned int byte_idx =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_mask_ofst +
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_mask_lbn / 8;
>> +		unsigned int bit_idx =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_mask_lbn % 8;
>> +		efx_mae_field_cap_id_t bit_cap_id =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_bit_cap_id;
>> +
>> +		if (bit_descp->emmbd_entry_is_valid == B_FALSE)
>> +			continue; /* Skip array gap */
>> +
>> +		if ((unsigned int)bit_cap_id >= field_ncaps) {
>> +			/* No capability for this bit = unsupported. */
>> +			is_valid = ((mvp[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx)) == 0);
>> +			if (is_valid == B_FALSE)
>> +				break;
>> +			else
>> +				continue;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		switch (field_caps[bit_cap_id].emfc_support) {
>> +		case MAE_FIELD_SUPPORTED_MATCH_OPTIONAL:
>> +			is_valid = B_TRUE;
>> +			break;
>> +		case MAE_FIELD_SUPPORTED_MATCH_ALWAYS:
>> +			is_valid = ((mvp[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx)) != 0);
>> +			break;
>> +		case MAE_FIELD_SUPPORTED_MATCH_NEVER:
>> +		case MAE_FIELD_UNSUPPORTED:
>> +		default:
>> +			is_valid = ((mvp[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx)) == 0);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>>   		if (is_valid == B_FALSE)
>>   			break;
>>   	}
>> @@ -1528,6 +1705,8 @@ efx_mae_match_specs_class_cmp(
>>   	const efx_mae_field_cap_t *field_caps;
>>   	const efx_mae_mv_desc_t *desc_setp;
>>   	unsigned int desc_set_nentries;
>> +	const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t *bit_desc_setp;
>> +	unsigned int bit_desc_set_nentries;
>>   	boolean_t have_same_class = B_TRUE;
>>   	efx_mae_field_id_t field_id;
>>   	const uint8_t *mvpl;
>> @@ -1540,6 +1719,9 @@ efx_mae_match_specs_class_cmp(
>>   		desc_setp = __efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_desc_set;
>>   		desc_set_nentries =
>>   		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_desc_set);
>> +		bit_desc_setp = __efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set;
>> +		bit_desc_set_nentries =
>> +		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_outer_rule_mv_bit_desc_set);
>>   		mvpl = left->emms_mask_value_pairs.outer;
>>   		mvpr = right->emms_mask_value_pairs.outer;
>>   		break;
>> @@ -1548,6 +1730,9 @@ efx_mae_match_specs_class_cmp(
>>   		desc_setp = __efx_mae_action_rule_mv_desc_set;
>>   		desc_set_nentries =
>>   		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_action_rule_mv_desc_set);
>> +		bit_desc_setp = __efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set;
>> +		bit_desc_set_nentries =
>> +		    EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(__efx_mae_action_rule_mv_bit_desc_set);
>>   		mvpl = left->emms_mask_value_pairs.action;
>>   		mvpr = right->emms_mask_value_pairs.action;
>>   		break;
>> @@ -1620,6 +1805,52 @@ efx_mae_match_specs_class_cmp(
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (have_same_class == B_FALSE)
>> +		goto done;
>> +
>> +	for (field_id = 0; (unsigned int)field_id < bit_desc_set_nentries;
>> +	     ++field_id) {
>> +		const efx_mae_mv_bit_desc_t *bit_descp =
>> +		    &bit_desc_setp[field_id];
>> +		efx_mae_field_cap_id_t bit_cap_id =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_bit_cap_id;
>> +		unsigned int byte_idx;
>> +		unsigned int bit_idx;
>> +
>> +		if (bit_descp->emmbd_entry_is_valid == B_FALSE)
>> +			continue; /* Skip array gap */
>> +
>> +		if ((unsigned int)bit_cap_id >= field_ncaps)
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		byte_idx =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_mask_ofst +
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_mask_lbn / 8;
>> +		bit_idx =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_mask_lbn % 8;
>> +
>> +		if (field_caps[bit_cap_id].emfc_mask_affects_class &&
>> +		    (mvpl[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx)) !=
>> +		    (mvpr[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx))) {
>> +			have_same_class = B_FALSE;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		byte_idx =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_value_ofst +
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_value_lbn / 8;
>> +		bit_idx =
>> +		    bit_descp->emmbd_value_lbn % 8;
>> +
>> +		if (field_caps[bit_cap_id].emfc_match_affects_class &&
>> +		    (mvpl[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx)) !=
>> +		    (mvpr[byte_idx] & (1U << bit_idx))) {
>> +			have_same_class = B_FALSE;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +done:
>>   	*have_same_classp = have_same_class;
>>   
>>   	return (0);
>> @@ -2254,10 +2485,10 @@ efx_mae_action_rule_insert(
>>   	 * MCDI request and are thus safe to be copied directly to the buffer.
>>   	 */
>>   	EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof (spec->emms_mask_value_pairs.action) >=
>> -	    MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_LEN);
>> +	    MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_LEN);
>>   	offset = MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA_OFST;
>>   	memcpy(payload + offset, spec->emms_mask_value_pairs.action,
>> -	    MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_LEN);
>> +	    MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_LEN);
>>   
>>   	efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/version.map b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/version.map
>> index 5e724fd10..75da5aa5c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/version.map
>> +++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/version.map
>> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ INTERNAL {
>>   	efx_mae_fini;
>>   	efx_mae_get_limits;
>>   	efx_mae_init;
>> +	efx_mae_match_spec_bit_set;
>>   	efx_mae_match_spec_field_set;
>>   	efx_mae_match_spec_fini;
>>   	efx_mae_match_spec_init;
>>

-- 
Ivan M

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28  9:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers Ivan Malov
2021-04-28  9:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] common/sfc_efx/base: add MAE VLAN presence match bits Ivan Malov
2021-04-28 10:08   ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-28 11:09     ` Ivan Malov [this message]
2021-04-30 14:49   ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-28  9:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/sfc: support matching on VLAN presence in transfer rules Ivan Malov
2021-04-30 15:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-30 17:05   ` Ivan Malov
2021-05-04  7:50     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-04  8:15       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-05-22 19:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Match On VLAN Presence In Transfer Flows Ivan Malov
2021-05-22 19:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers Ivan Malov
2021-05-22 19:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] common/sfc_efx/base: add MAE VLAN presence match bits Ivan Malov
2021-05-22 19:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] net/sfc: support matching on VLAN presence in transfer rules Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Match On VLAN Presence In Transfer Flows Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] common/sfc_efx/base: add MAE VLAN presence match bits Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/sfc: support matching on VLAN presence in transfer rules Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Match On VLAN Presence In Transfer Flows Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] common/sfc_efx/base: add MAE VLAN presence match bits Ivan Malov
2021-05-24 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] net/sfc: support matching on VLAN presence in transfer rules Ivan Malov
2021-07-07 10:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Match On VLAN Presence In Transfer Flows David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79ed0113-5574-55b9-2e7c-df77558c4cef@oktetlabs.ru \
    --to=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=amoreton@xilinx.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).