From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4A8DA9 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:09:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2015 08:08:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,248,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="843919089" Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.157]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2015 08:08:51 -0800 Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.49]) by IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.116]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:08:50 +0000 From: "Mrzyglod, DanielX T" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Mcnamara, John" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] add sample ptp slave application Thread-Index: AQHRFuigFRv5MkTT9kumQOAzn2Gpap6NYkwAgAAqEoCAAAo9gA== Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: <7ADD74816B4C8A45B56203CBA65FE5A61D97FE03@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1443799208-9408-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> <1446631581-4040-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> <1982251.z84bCL8u46@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1982251.z84bCL8u46@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] add sample ptp slave application X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:09:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > 2015-11-05 12:46, Mcnamara, John: > > Why is this patchset marked as "Deferred"? > > > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/?state=3D10 >=20 > Because it is too late to integrate new networking features in 2.2 > (except for packet framework). > It will be welcome in the 2.3 timeframe starting in December. Those patches are basically fixes and supplement to aee686ea17290271d6230= 8b0f559c46e33f6364b V1 were send on merge window. V2 were send send at review window. V2 were Acked but there was Konstantin's request to move common structures. V3 was send as fast as possible. >>From my point of view it should be added to RC2.