From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61B5C32A for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:55:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2015 01:55:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,346,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="829423965" Received: from irsmsx152.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.66]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2015 01:55:19 -0800 Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.132]) by IRSMSX152.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.143]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:55:18 +0000 From: "Mrzyglod, DanielX T" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/bond: add header to support freebsd compilation Thread-Index: AQHRJ6x+VoyRv9F91EKeXeIY1cChEJ6uEQfw Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:55:17 +0000 Message-ID: <7ADD74816B4C8A45B56203CBA65FE5A61D98EE13@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1448474637-4232-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> <1665282.JFVSfXMvij@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1665282.JFVSfXMvij@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/bond: add header to support freebsd compilation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:55:23 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 7:08 PM > >2015-11-25 19:03, Daniel Mrzyglod: >> definition of 'AF_INET' enum was missing - is available in >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod > >It is definitely the right fix as Ferruh submitted the same one >less than one hour ago. >Should we understand it is an ack? > >It seems Ferruh was hesitating about the line where inserting the >include. I would say I prefer your choice :) I acked Ferruh patch. I didn't notice he send patch first. You can combine both patches :> He has much better description :>