From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>, <orika@mellanox.com>,
<john.mcnamara@intel.com>, <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
<thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <asafp@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: refine ethernet and VLAN flow rule items
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:00:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b474ff0-7e9c-aa01-637b-61cc61d34aa4@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb947e6d53c37ae1c3f5618b2b56411c66206fa7.1587666081.git.dekelp@mellanox.com>
On 4/23/20 9:30 PM, Dekel Peled wrote:
> Specified pattern may be translated in different manner.
> For example the pattern "eth / ipv4" can be translated to match
> untagged packets only, since the pattern doesn't specify a vlan item.
vlan -> VLAN
> It can also be translated to match both tagged and untagged packets,
> for the same reason.
> This patch updates the rte_flow documentation to clearly specify the
> required pattern to use.
> For example:
> To match tagged ipv4 packets, the pattern "eth type is 0x8100 /
> vlan / ipv4 / end" should be used.
Isn't eth / vlan / ipv4 /end sufficient? What's the difference?
I guess later should allow any VLAN TPID, but it is greyish
since it is HW dependent.
> To match untagged ipv4 packets, the pattern "eth type is 0x0800 /
> ipv4 / end" should be used.
What about eth / ipv4 / end?
Does usage of ipv4 assume that EtherType is 0x0800?
> To match both tagged and untagged packets, the pattern "eth / end"
> should be used.
The interesting question is what should be used if I want
either tagged or untagged IPv4 packets. I think it worse
to mention to make the picture complete.
> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 8 ++++++++
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> index cf4368e..0d1c305 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> @@ -905,6 +905,12 @@ so-called layer 2.5 pattern items such as ``RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN``. In
> the latter case, ``type`` refers to that of the outer header, with the inner
> EtherType/TPID provided by the subsequent pattern item. This is the same
> order as on the wire.
> +If the ``type`` field contains a TPID value, then only tagged packets will match
> +the pattern.
Shouldn't we emphasis that "tagged packets with specified TPID
will match the pattern." since tagged packets could have
various TPIDs.
> +If the ``type`` field contains another EtherType value, then only untagged
> +packets will match the pattern.
I'm afraid "another EtherType" is too ambiguous.
"non-TPID EtherType" is ambiguous as well and HW
dependent. May be it is better to remove the sentence
completely.
> +If the ``ETH`` item is the only item in the pattern, and the ``type`` field is
> +not specified, then both tagged and untagged packets will match the pattern.
>
> - ``dst``: destination MAC.
> - ``src``: source MAC.
> @@ -919,6 +925,8 @@ Matches an 802.1Q/ad VLAN tag.
> The corresponding standard outer EtherType (TPID) values are
> ``RTE_ETHER_TYPE_VLAN`` or ``RTE_ETHER_TYPE_QINQ``. It can be overridden by the
> preceding pattern item.
> +If a ``VLAN`` item is present in the pattern, then only tagged packets will
> +match the pattern.
>
> - ``tci``: tag control information.
> - ``inner_type``: inner EtherType or TPID.
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index 132b44e..178e87e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -710,6 +710,13 @@ struct rte_flow_item_raw {
> * the latter case, @p type refers to that of the outer header, with the
> * inner EtherType/TPID provided by the subsequent pattern item. This is the
> * same order as on the wire.
> + * If the @p type field contains a TPID value, then only tagged packets will
> + * match the pattern.
> + * If the @p type field contains another EtherType value, then only untagged
> + * packets will match the pattern.
> + * If the @p ETH item is the only item in the pattern, and the @p type field
> + * is not specified, then both tagged and untagged packets will match the
> + * pattern.
> */
> struct rte_flow_item_eth {
> struct rte_ether_addr dst; /**< Destination MAC. */
> @@ -734,6 +741,8 @@ struct rte_flow_item_eth {
> * The corresponding standard outer EtherType (TPID) values are
> * RTE_ETHER_TYPE_VLAN or RTE_ETHER_TYPE_QINQ. It can be overridden by
> * the preceding pattern item.
> + * If a @p VLAN item is present in the pattern, then only tagged packets will
> + * match the pattern.
> */
> struct rte_flow_item_vlan {
> rte_be16_t tci; /**< Tag control information. */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-25 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 18:30 Dekel Peled
2020-04-25 14:00 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2020-04-26 9:18 ` Dekel Peled
2020-04-26 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-27 6:52 ` Ori Kam
2020-05-03 7:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Dekel Peled
2020-05-03 9:56 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-05-03 14:57 ` Ori Kam
2020-05-07 14:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 16:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b474ff0-7e9c-aa01-637b-61cc61d34aa4@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=asafp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).