Hi Ferruh,

On 5/8/2023 2:21 AM, zhoumin wrote:

Kindly ping.

Hi Min,

Sorry for the delay.

Should we solve this problem by modifying PMDs?

Is it suitable to maintain the RSS configurations for NIC by testpmd in
order to set DCB?


On Thur, Apr 27, 2023 at 4:33PM, zhoumin wrote:

Kindly ping.

Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated.

Best regards
Min


On 2023/4/12 下午5:52, Min Zhou wrote:

In the testpmd command, we have to stop the port firstly before
configuring
the DCB. However, some PMDs may execute a hardware reset during the port
stop, such as ixgbe. Some kind of reset operations of PMD could clear
the
configurations of RSS in the hardware register. This would cause the
loss
of RSS configurations that were set during the testpmd
initialization. As
a result, I find that I cannot enable RSS and DCB at the same time in
the
testpmd command when using Intel 82599 NIC.

cc'ed ixgbe maintainers too.

@Qiming, @Wenjun, are you testing DCB with RSS configuration?


Min,

Can you please give more detail on the problem, do you have in only on
device reset, or is there a generic problem on enabling DCB with RSS?

Yes, I will give more details on the problem blow.

I think it is not a generic problem on enabling DCB with RSS. It depends on the implementation of "port stop" in the driver's codes. I can successfully enable DCB with RSS in the testpmd when it uses the i40e driver.

It's very easy to reproduce this problem. I will demonstrate the process below:

1. First we start the testpmd program with enabling  RSS using 82599 NICs:

$ ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 0-6 -- -i --rss-ip --rxq=6 --txq=6 --nb-cores=6

2. Then show the RSS configuration in the testpmd:

testpmd> show port 0 rss-hash

RSS functions:
  ipv4  ipv6  ipv6-ex

3. The above outputs are normal and then we try to enable DCB:

testpmd> port config 0 dcb vt off 4 pfc on
Please stop port 0 first

4. So we have to stop the port before enabling DCB:

5. However, we will find that the RSS was disabled after stopping the port:

testpmd> show port 0 rss-hash
RSS disabled

RSS is enabled in the MRQC register of 82599. The MRQC register supplied in section 8.2.3.7.12 of the Intel 82599 datasheet.

I added some outputs before and after port reset in the port stop process of ixgbe driver as follows:

diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_82599.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_82599.c
index c6e8b7e976..b13431a43f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_82599.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_82599.c
@@ -1053,6 +1053,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_reset_hw_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
                if (link_up)
                        ctrl = IXGBE_CTRL_RST;
        }
+       printf("%s: MRQC = 0x%x\n", __func__, IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC));
 
        ctrl |= IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_CTRL);
        IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_CTRL, ctrl);
@@ -1065,6 +1066,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_reset_hw_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
                if (!(ctrl & IXGBE_CTRL_RST_MASK))
                        break;
        }
+       printf("%s: MRQC = 0x%x\n", __func__, IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_MRQC));
 
        if (ctrl & IXGBE_CTRL_RST_MASK) {
                status = IXGBE_ERR_RESET_FAILED;

We could find that the RSS configurations will be cleared after port reset as follows:

testpmd> port stop 0
Stopping ports...
ixgbe_reset_hw_82599: MRQC = 0x1a0001
ixgbe_reset_hw_82599: MRQC = 0x0
Checking link statuses...
ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(): Other link thread is running now!
Done

However, I have not find the exact descriptions about this behavior in the 82599 datasheet. Could @Qiming, @Wenjun give me some indications ?

So, if we want to get the RSS configurations by reading from the register after the port stop, we will get nothing.

Also can you please describe how/why removing RSS configuration (this
patch) helps on the problem?

As above said, I'm concerned whether we could reuse the RSS configurations recorded in the testpmd if the port reset cannot be avoided in the driver.

So, this patch wants to reuse the RSS configurations maintained by testpmd instead of reading from the register.

I'm not sure if this is a reasonable method to solve this problem.

Thanks,
ferruh

[...]

Best regards,

Min