From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F060AA09D9; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:43:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5504BF90; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:43:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9A0F64 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:43:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id 10so1811394wml.2 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:43:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=YM7gIitWS4gWwzjvqiH5b2ahScDRfcQTjjQtTSAyfuE=; b=QgfhzATfE/kFy2DmNqq74lUAmxiOPiqhVdaQ3p8Wua6PqA1+NyrIoCVYtqlFqrmp/+ iEEBQpdnqN+rsEpJUUfR/1jwj1SQCPXZDqSg8nSLobzAb3SMkTD8pMdEdUAhbxJy+jP1 1XFWs252+ZbrUCmQc1wcj6wUNb89tORtuhfK3E4tp9K1I7XHcuazGt7mZP+M0p3AQmu+ g7+EVPqvdRRUvQdZlioobfc9e+7vibN6GJx3Jq0ngxNci+bla3NQ3sSa+aHe2AWSkGKw BgBaS7n/tP05CQRHyZlADrt9ox4OzdufKmCRleVgmkPG/HVYeTJYRG18aA66znzBo9EY 14Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zrW9vkZRsGW5AQ2pqWI7GnR2VqjlMhv6ZxJwlWslZ+nzNhp1f U4bLleg12Ql/r7Rkcx59509rNxtQoRz0Wz4R X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxV2K3gqPQpPMlOGPZWyiKJXEeJizLJqn475K5CbPdhYcHsxwV8UHM5y5Er6Ybye144KiKSBw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:790c:: with SMTP id l12mr3132429wme.47.1605091431553; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:43:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u81sm2327228wmb.27.2020.11.11.02.43.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:43:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7d0a27e01bff9b18eb3fc8d53b0d2bf1e62200d4.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:43:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20201110225544.1876-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200922143202.8755-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20201110225544.1876-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20201110225544.1876-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/7] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enum X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 14:55 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This patch renames the enum values in the EAL include files. > As a backward compatible temporary migration tool, define > a replacement mapping for old values. >=20 > The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced > by block list and allow list, but applications may be using the > older compatibility macros. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > Acked-by: Luca Boccassi > Acked-by: Gaetan Rivet > --- > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_devargs.c | 14 +++++++------- > lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h | 8 ++++++-- > lib/librte_eal/include/rte_dev.h | 8 ++++++-- > lib/librte_eal/include/rte_devargs.h | 8 ++++++-- > 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Luca Boccassi --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi