From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2A88D4D for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:22:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2016 06:22:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,334,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="168062750" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.117]) ([10.237.220.117]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2016 06:22:20 -0700 To: Jeff Shaw , dev@dpdk.org, helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com References: <1468515542-39207-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com> <1542652.v1vhCPdXLZ@xps13> <20160901144727.GA92363@ar11-dell-r730-02-jeff.jf.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Monjalon , damarion@cisco.com From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <7d1bfca3-2490-b4f6-d927-3ae5171dc381@intel.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:22:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160901144727.GA92363@ar11-dell-r730-02-jeff.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add ptype and xsum handling in i40e rx vpmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:22:22 -0000 On 9/1/2016 3:47 PM, Jeff Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:26:23PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 2016-07-14 09:59, Jeff Shaw: >>> Our testing suggests minimal (in some cases zero) impact to core-bound >>> forwarding throughput as measured by testpmd. Throughput increase is >>> observed in l3fwd as now the vpmd can be used with hw_ip_checksum >>> enabled and without needing '--parse-ptype'. >>> >>> The benefits to applications using this functionality is realized when >>> Ethernet processing and L3/L4 checksum validation can be skipped. >>> >>> We hope others can also test performance in their applications while >>> conducting a review of this series. >> >> Thanks for the patches. They need some careful review and are a bit late >> for an integration in 16.07. Thus they are pending for 16.11. > > Hello, I noticed there are other patches going into i40e ahead of this > one. Would somebody please review and merge this one if there are no > issues? > i40e maintainers, can you please review the patch? Thanks, ferruh