From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF31A04E7; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 23:54:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702F128EE; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 23:54:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2EC1E2B for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 23:54:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862DE5800DF; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 17:54:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:54:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 9epQjbo+UKbaQP7V1XjmMRAZEtWajTf3wSm+3uMNVNg=; b=nA8c9QgAQeEqPLEF QmRUt4ReBKOGEVv7fYCIYZvyTHzDjkx971SFXzA7gLWrnz7eTrG4LMLvp6z9vYW/ 4oAjZwdEFZCvfNUaSbr1xs4RiXy01d/6hI2MoINGPLCisD10W848cu62DP01LSfv wpcAE9noH5RaTWjKDfpnXOm0H85Z+2H0W6lVKnGf/GMR/FcJr5hrS7B8gCrcWUnT 4eGYq0vZ8nWonBZBFewATaPYNS2G20ku3+B4KYLxhAdz2JyfIVJui9dnSahAWd84 cjSV2hSS4BXxIjZo8mPsx8QyUCKqQeWD7hRdiTpQw3qAHidCIfQEhtbo44qwG903 wD7o7w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9epQjbo+UKbaQP7V1XjmMRAZEtWajTf3wSm+3uMNV Ng=; b=m7yMTZf/18RyeKZL7F03GDmTXRE6D35mNSqN6lSQ7P+rejdf4BaHKa9to 6PBMX1pKNzbtn4d8nOYwcbudVuehMOxTDRTdo7cZ42mMulZ0NyFQMJMc6mPNO/Cp rKp8uOBBBBqjdANdYWzFAu/Q0gGuIpLdB94Q1hU9AuFDBJ/F6A5SgIHdsCgeUVCZ asErZIEgv63/yGhj8+OhLR+uhistFI7oYO/kTZyXtLB9AewgKE+XMMbgx2TaYGUt qD6OiLRzX+pfKuwj7c+nEBn4FE9a0/ckr7V2K8RjXYY8j0nTFzwwDpHmlE2iPw5m ZINrOZ5hggtG5QUmW6vig4zg9wAsQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddttddgtddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C74DE328005A; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 17:54:38 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com, jerinj@marvell.com, Wenzhuo Lu , Beilei Xing , Bernard Iremonger , Matan Azrad , Shahaf Shuler , Viacheslav Ovsiienko Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 23:54:37 +0100 Message-ID: <8022490.CYqtBaTCH8@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20201026052105.1561859-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201030172940.1073558-4-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/15] ethdev: register mbuf field and flags for timestamp X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/11/2020 21:10, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 10/30/20 8:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > + static bool done_rx, done_tx; > > Are these static fields remain by intention? May be I misunderstand > the summary of the previous discussion. Andrew, you are reading the wrong thread. The timestamp series has been sent by mistake as v5 of the userdata series. Please read v6 of userdata (merged) and v2 of timestamp series. All your comments have been addressed.