DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@intel.com>,
	david.marchand@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix rte_intr_dp_is_en() check
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:21:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8032858.THXMY6Ofjq@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578C74D9.1030907@intel.com>

Hi Yong,

I think the interrupt management should be simpler.
If you want to invest some time to rework this API, you
are very welcome.


2016-07-18 14:19, Liang, Cunming:
> Hi Yong,
> 
> rte_intr_dp_is_en() returns true when rte_intr_efd_enable() (the way to 
> enable data-path interrupt) sets a number of event fds.
> In this case, "intr_conf.rxq=1" configuration causes "nb_efd=1". The 
> value comes from RTE_MIN($nb_efd, 1) from data-path, but not from link 
> event.
> Per link event, you shouldn't use rte_intr_dp_is_en() as the indication.
> As igb_uio only has a single vector, when the conflict(both intr_rxq and 
> intr_lsc turn on) happens, the intr_rxq has high priority than intr_lsc 
> as default PMD behavior.
> Reference as PG 3.1.9 note in 
> http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.html
> 
> Regards,
> Cunming
> 
> On 7/15/2016 8:36 AM, Yong Wang wrote:
> > When binding a device to igb_uio with intr_conf.rxq set to 1, nb_efd
> > is 1 (for link event) but rte_intr_dp_is_en() will still return true.
> > rte_intr_dp_is_en() should also consider intr_handle type in addition
> > to nb_efd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15  0:36 Yong Wang
2016-07-18  6:19 ` Liang, Cunming
2016-07-18  9:21   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-07-19 21:58     ` Yong Wang
2016-07-20  7:03       ` Liang, Cunming
2016-07-20  8:41         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-20  8:56           ` Liang, Cunming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8032858.THXMY6Ofjq@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).