From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8EFA0566; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:04:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E9B1C0AA; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:04:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859381C06B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:04:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02HH3wWf065992; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:04:22 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yrue3dfvy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:04:22 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 02HH4Lio068765; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:04:21 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yrue3de8g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:04:20 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02HGu8hs011261; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:10 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2yrpw69sqb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:10 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02HH29Au45482308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:09 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A57BB2067; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E197B205F; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.16.170.189]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:08 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:02:07 -0700 From: dwilder To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: aconole@redhat.com, maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech, nd@arm.com In-Reply-To: <20200313081614.195335-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> References: <20200225073236.135581-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20200313081614.195335-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Message-ID: <80600da8b0e80d2f0f6dd7691cc6f482@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Sender: dwilder@us.ibm.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-17_06:2020-03-17, 2020-03-17 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003170067 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] no-huge unit test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 2020-03-13 01:16, Ruifeng Wang wrote: > For environments (such as containers) where hugetlbfs are not > available, > some unit tests can be run with 'no-huge' option. > > fast-tests suites is generated dynamically according to hugetlbfs > availability in building environment. This allows unit test to run > in different environments using the same suite name. > > Several test cases are fixed to be able to run in no-huge mode. > > v3: > Use a single suite instead of create additional one for no-huge. > (Aaron) > Fix several test cases in no-huge mode. > > v2: > Add a patch to enable running multiple suites in a job. (David) > > > Ruifeng Wang (4): > test: enable tests to run in no-huge mode > ci: generate fast-tests suite base on hugepage availability > ci: proceed with verification without hugepage > ci: enable unit test for aarch64 > > .ci/linux-setup.sh | 11 +- > .travis.yml | 5 +- > app/test/meson.build | 216 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > app/test/test_acl.c | 22 ++-- > app/test/test_hash.c | 7 +- > app/test/test_table_pipeline.c | 12 +- > 6 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) I added Ruifeng's patches on top of my ppc64le ci patches and updated the matrix. Ci ran fine on ppc64le. https://travis-ci.org/github/djlwilder/dpdk/jobs/663573687 Tested-by: David Wilder