From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303EB376D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n184so82151338wmn.1 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 02:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BaRJqZBGqBfUJkqnm6SpskQ7fwLGmQbBBOjplNuT7sY=; b=2KFvkdmKkBEtyuEUPwaedgyPVtt0BNlDgg90Q72xjQ47NoxtZ6fGBJLyuDJcZVkajf 0mxxw5Y6UOdiD2nv6QhQ115IOwB1sSSNKvuptWqfN/VaCrrF7HOXImOfMdcWLHGyH0+U PKcba07nDECfystwqmSAlNzFXakdz+0V334LqS9gzw9HbGPSDtZo4Qx71V/ZEBL8KjK6 R+HxuLseZ/ZUNUaIxyMod/ra8vNlXsOZpTpHsZ3/i7gc7Cv0wAzDvAKYgMeFEgm1+S1U dbV+pWOO5QEnye9dCP8dLBJz8/4O/rq4X9/ze+zu3cyUb5llmZ2RIml2lXpLBknkqPyg jA+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BaRJqZBGqBfUJkqnm6SpskQ7fwLGmQbBBOjplNuT7sY=; b=Z+NRGphOwhgvekVuCCM56LZvQ0Ia31CgTLIsY893OY4OVnaM9C7A5GHFbOEldDucFw 0cH5UYGc0HfZ7ddy5S4EAz66layQZXspV1/E0MPB5EV+GgFBP+thslqvYHEFjEYGpllp apoJKVnVAVytSL1nSiU8Qpwe4e589rKi9sINNn51TXzlm7S+SIBjeEtSE8+dhk7Ixu8U aV6YCZanNsMb/CO0C3eAhZ455YBR2WN9/ZR6uu3utDPXsAk7J4d1J/dypH2y9QBxj5On GbgZYKjvOTW1MhQk082AeEDAxsoPfHaUq84moNQodE3p3nSBON70NyBvheN5L3rbVx+u s8HQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKFpMIdJfbw4teTX/BfxVfKuKUTqnR/ngS371RFTQy2tZERemij+1wv7J59MpsV/XM/ X-Received: by 10.28.72.134 with SMTP id v128mr11128074wma.28.1465204635899; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u70sm3340928wmd.4.2016.06.06.02.17.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yuanhan Liu Cc: Tetsuya Mukawa , dev@dpdk.org, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, huawei.xie@intel.com, David Marchand Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:51:15 +0200 Message-ID: <81387447.FL6Ak3iYVL@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160603041748.GW10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1457512409-24403-12-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <687ff542-f97b-8706-5f96-0727dfcdf174@igel.co.jp> <20160603041748.GW10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] Virtio-net PMD: QEMU QTest extension for container X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 09:17:16 -0000 2016-06-03 12:17, Yuanhan Liu: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > > Hi Yuanhan, > > > > On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > > But still, I'd ask do we really need 2 virtio for container solutions? > > > > I appreciate your comments. > > No, I appreciate your effort for contributing to DPDK! vhost-pmd stuff > is just brilliant! > > > Let me have time to discuss it with our team. > > I'm wondering could we have one solution only. IMO, the drawback of > having two (quite different) solutions might outweighs the benefit > it takes. Say, it might just confuse user. +1 > OTOH, I'm wondering could you adapt to Jianfeng's solution? If not, > what's the missing parts, and could we fix it? I'm thinking having > one unified solution will keep ours energy/focus on one thing, making > it better and better! Having two just splits the energy; it also > introduces extra burden for maintaining. +1